Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] main from microsoft:main #40

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

[pull] main from microsoft:main #40

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Mar 15, 2024

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 15, 2024
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (2f8529c)

Copy link

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

2, because the changes are primarily configuration updates in a single YAML file, which are straightforward to review. The modifications include updates to triggers, scheduling, GitHub Actions versions, and job configurations. These changes are well-documented and follow best practices for GitHub Actions and CodeQL setup.

🧪 Relevant tests

No, as this PR updates a GitHub Actions workflow, specific unit or integration tests are not applicable. However, it's important to ensure that the workflow runs successfully after these changes.

🔍 Possible issues

Possible Misconfiguration: Ensure that the branches dev and certification exist and are relevant for CodeQL analysis. If these branches do not exist or are not used for code that should be analyzed, this could lead to unnecessary workflow runs.

Schedule Timing: The change in the scheduled run time to every Wednesday might not align with the team's release or development cycle. It's important to ensure that this timing is optimal for identifying and addressing vulnerabilities.

🔒 Security concerns

No, the changes made in this PR do not introduce any direct security vulnerabilities. However, it's crucial to ensure that the permissions configuration does not inadvertently grant more permissions than necessary for the workflow to function securely.


✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Mar 15, 2024

PR Code Suggestions

CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
Enhancement
Expand the language matrix for comprehensive code analysis.

Consider specifying more languages in the matrix.language to ensure comprehensive code
analysis across different parts of your project. If your project includes other languages
like Python, Java, or Go, adding them to the matrix will enhance the analysis coverage.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml [24]

 matrix:
-  language: ['typescript']
+  language: ['typescript', 'python', 'java', 'go']
 
Fetch the entire git history for comprehensive CodeQL analysis.

To ensure the CodeQL analysis captures all relevant code paths and dependencies, consider
setting fetch-depth to 0 in the Checkout repository step. This change will fetch the
entire git history.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml [30]

 with:
-  fetch-depth: 2
+  fetch-depth: 0
 
Best practice
Pin action versions to specific commit SHAs for reliability.

For better reliability, consider pinning the action versions to a specific commit SHA
instead of using tags like v3 or v4. This approach prevents potential issues caused by
unexpected changes in these actions.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml [28]

-uses: actions/checkout@v4
+uses: actions/checkout@sha256:<specific-commit-SHA>
 
Review workflow permissions for the principle of least privilege.

It's a good practice to limit the permissions granted to the GitHub Actions workflow to
only what is necessary. Review the permissions section to ensure it aligns with the
principle of least privilege.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml [16-19]

 permissions:
-  actions: read
   contents: read
   security-events: write
 
Use a specific Node.js version for build stability.

To avoid potential build issues with future Node.js versions, consider using a more
specific version of Node.js instead of the major version 18.x. Pinning to a specific minor
or patch version can enhance build stability.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml [35]

-node-version: 18.x
+node-version: 18.3.0
 

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality
  • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
  • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
  • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
  • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@pull pull bot added ⤵️ pull and removed enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2 labels Mar 15, 2024
@pull pull bot merged commit 2f8529c into visualbis:main Mar 15, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant