You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regarding the Social GAN model and while playing with your code, I found something that I couldn't understand.
E.g while running:
python -m trajnetbaselines.sgan.trainer --k 1
It means that we are running a vanilla GAN where the generator outputs one sample (the most common GAN setting without the L2 loss); In doing so, the GAN loss is always 1.38 throughout the training. Thus, the vanilla GAN (with only the adversarial loss) is not capable of modeling the data.
My question is to what extent are we taking advantage of a GAN framework? It seems that we are only training an LSTM predictor (when running under the aforementioned conditions).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Regarding the Social GAN model and while playing with your code, I found something that I couldn't understand.
E.g while running:
It means that we are running a vanilla GAN where the generator outputs one sample (the most common GAN setting without the L2 loss); In doing so, the GAN loss is always 1.38 throughout the training. Thus, the vanilla GAN (with only the adversarial loss) is not capable of modeling the data.
My question is to what extent are we taking advantage of a GAN framework? It seems that we are only training an LSTM predictor (when running under the aforementioned conditions).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: