Should non-legacy decorators be transpiled?

[Marsup]

Hi!

I'm trying out rolldown-vite to see how it behaves compared to our existing vite setup, it seems much faster, but it passes decorators as-is without any transformation. I've seen discussions about legacy decorators, but we're not using those. I tried changing the target to various ES versions without success. Vite works out of the box, but I think it uses swc to transpile those, does it mean I should add a swc plugin to achieve the same result?

Thanks!

[sapphi-red]

Transpilation of ecma decorators (non-legacy decorators) are not supported by Oxc yet. It would be nice if you can write the reason why you are using it in oxc-project/oxc#9170 so we can understand the usage. Thanks!

[Marsup]

You mean why I'm using the stage 3 decorators instead of the legacy ones? Because it feels like they were the way to go, no specific reason other than that.

[sapphi-red]

I was wondering if you have a specific library that requires it.

[Marsup]

Not at all, only custom decorators to have a better DX on our side.