Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider dual-license as Apache 2.0 #4

Open
mattyb149 opened this issue Jun 28, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Consider dual-license as Apache 2.0 #4

mattyb149 opened this issue Jun 28, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@mattyb149
Copy link

LIVR looks like a great tool for data validation and we are looking at it as a possible integration with Apache NiFi, but I don't think the Artistic License (even 2.0) is fully compatible with the ASL 2.0, and/or accepted by the Apache Software Foundation (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Is it possible to (and if so, would you please consider) also license this project under ASL 2.0?

@vlbaluk
Copy link
Owner

vlbaluk commented Jul 5, 2018 via email

@fabiobeoni
Copy link

Hello @vlbaluk, I follow this issue with interest.

You ask about a sample to include the ASL2.0 license, I found the following sample from https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Do you think is that okay for you?

Thanks a-lot for this nice software.


Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants