-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vcd_nsxt_firewall does not manage ranges and individual IP addresses #1199
Comments
I see this has not been addressed by 3.12 :-( |
any news on this? |
We're considering the V2 firewall rule API. The trick is we can't fully switch to V2 API in current resource I do see that V2 has a better API for creating a resource How does this approach sound to you? Would you switch resources if we had this new one? Does it sound more convenient for you? |
I've to manage fw rules using terraform for tenants that are modified also using UI. |
Ok, if you had a choice between to resources - the one that manages all rules, and the one that manages rules on by one - which would you prefer? (I can't promise this works out, but feedback is valuable) |
Now I'm using for both (fw and dfw) the "monolithic" resource, but the solution I've found is not optimal. |
This is the new Improved Firewall Rules UI
VMware Cloud Director 10.5 provides enhanced user experience for firewall rule expressions. You can now create a single firewall rule and, optionally, position it at a specific position in the rules list, and reorder a single firewall rule without editing the entire list of existing firewall rules. You can also add ranges and individual IP addresses directly into the firewall rule Source and Destination text boxes. Firewall rules now have a loggingId element that corresponds to the NSX rule_id.
Also raw protocol/port can be used via UI (not just an application profile)
is this in roadmap for 3.12?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: