-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Download speed question #112
Comments
I expect it to be faster if: That said, I would like to have a local cache for versioned fetches. I have opened #114 to track that. |
Thanks, I've updated from There are a couple of other suggestions I was thinking -
|
There is issue #3 for colorizing the output. For me, it is more of a gimmick, but I do appreciate it is a nice touch. I am just not sure where to get started with that, so if someone wants to do some investigation, prime the pump and point me to some resources for knowing what to do, I'm all for that if they do not want to do a full patch. We should track that in #3. For the parallel downloads, I have opened #116 to track the parallel download request, with some notes. Going to close this as we have specific tickets for suggestions, but feel free to continue discussion in this ticket and we can spin off other tickets as needed. |
Wow, a parallel download system would be great. I'm not sure if this is what you were getting at, but for colouring there is a native intro here: And this is the npm module used by jitsu, which seems quite straightforward: |
Volojs feels extremely slow. For example Bower and Jamjs also have a caching mechanism, so if 'codemirror' was already pulled, it will take ~3 seconds to install again. |
I've got a project with 16 dependencies and each repo download takes about 8 seconds to complete (I'm in South Africa, we're not renowned for our fast internet connections). What's interesting is that when I load the URLs directly in the browser, it only takes me about 2 seconds to load that same URL. I know Volo needs to do a repo search and could also be checking the amd-repo list, but I'm still not entirely sure how that is all filling up 8 seconds. Just wondering if there's any scope for speed improvements, because I think it's an important factor for adoption as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: