-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new spec: CDDL (RFC8610) #1651
Labels
new spec
Suggestion to add a new spec
Comments
Changes to
|
the shortTitle is wrong (CBOR); otherwise, LGTM |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
…to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures Close #1651, adding the suggested spec to the list. ### Changes to `index.json` This update would trigger the following changes in `index.json`: <details><summary>Add spec (1)</summary> ```json { "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610", "seriesComposition": "full", "shortname": "rfc8610", "series": { "shortname": "rfc8610", "currentSpecification": "rfc8610", "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", "shortTitle": "CDDL", "nightlyUrl": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610" }, "shortTitle": "CDDL", "organization": "IETF", "groups": [ { "name": "Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions Working Group", "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cbor/" } ], "nightly": { "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610", "status": "Proposed Standard", "alternateUrls": [ "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8610", "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8610" ], "filename": "rfc8610.html" }, "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", "source": "ietf", "categories": [ "browser" ], "standing": "good" } ``` </details> ### Tests These changes look good! 😎
tidoust
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
Close #1651, adding the suggested spec to the list. Co-authored-by: browser-specs-bot <>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610
Rationale
I'd like to add logic to Reffy to extract and export type definitions from the Standard Prelude, so that spec authoring tools may automatically link these types when they appear in other specifications.
Additional properties
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: