Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new spec: CDDL (RFC8610) #1651

Closed
tidoust opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1652
Closed

Add new spec: CDDL (RFC8610) #1651

tidoust opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1652
Assignees
Labels
new spec Suggestion to add a new spec

Comments

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Jan 17, 2025

URL

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610

Rationale

I'd like to add logic to Reffy to extract and export type definitions from the Standard Prelude, so that spec authoring tools may automatically link these types when they appear in other specifications.

Additional properties

{
  "shortTitle": "CDDL"
}
@tidoust tidoust added the new spec Suggestion to add a new spec label Jan 17, 2025
@browser-specs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

browser-specs-bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Changes to index.json

This update would trigger the following changes in index.json:

Add spec (1)
{
  "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "rfc8610",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "rfc8610",
    "currentSpecification": "rfc8610",
    "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures",
    "shortTitle": "CDDL",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610"
  },
  "shortTitle": "CDDL",
  "organization": "IETF",
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions Working Group",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cbor/"
    }
  ],
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610",
    "status": "Proposed Standard",
    "alternateUrls": [
      "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8610",
      "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8610"
    ],
    "filename": "rfc8610.html"
  },
  "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures",
  "source": "ietf",
  "categories": [
    "browser"
  ],
  "standing": "good"
}

Tests

These changes look good! 😎

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

the shortTitle is wrong (CBOR); otherwise, LGTM

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

@browser-specs-bot pr

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
…to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures

Close #1651, adding the suggested spec to the list.

### Changes to `index.json`
This update would trigger the following changes in `index.json`:

<details><summary>Add spec (1)</summary>

```json
{
  "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "rfc8610",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "rfc8610",
    "currentSpecification": "rfc8610",
    "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures",
    "shortTitle": "CDDL",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610"
  },
  "shortTitle": "CDDL",
  "organization": "IETF",
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions Working Group",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cbor/"
    }
  ],
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610",
    "status": "Proposed Standard",
    "alternateUrls": [
      "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8610",
      "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8610"
    ],
    "filename": "rfc8610.html"
  },
  "title": "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures",
  "source": "ietf",
  "categories": [
    "browser"
  ],
  "standing": "good"
}
```
</details>

### Tests
These changes look good! 😎
tidoust pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
Close #1651, adding the suggested spec to the list.

Co-authored-by: browser-specs-bot <>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new spec Suggestion to add a new spec
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants