You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #7708 it was resolved that, aside from the existing spec text for line-clamp which fragments away the clamped content, spec text should also be added for another variant which lays out the clamped content but doesn't paint it. This issue is about writing spec text for this variant.
I'm currently working on an implementation of this variant in Chromium, which treats line-clamp as a longhand accepting only the values none | auto | <integer [1,∞]>, and I wrote some initial spec text describing the intent of this implementation.
That spec text is still a WIP, and it replaces the existing line-clamp-related sections rather than modifying or extending them, so the plan is not to merge that as is, but to have a somewhat concrete starting point for a conversation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #7708 it was resolved that, aside from the existing spec text for
line-clamp
which fragments away the clamped content, spec text should also be added for another variant which lays out the clamped content but doesn't paint it. This issue is about writing spec text for this variant.I'm currently working on an implementation of this variant in Chromium, which treats
line-clamp
as a longhand accepting only the valuesnone | auto | <integer [1,∞]>
, and I wrote some initial spec text describing the intent of this implementation.That spec text is still a WIP, and it replaces the existing
line-clamp
-related sections rather than modifying or extending them, so the plan is not to merge that as is, but to have a somewhat concrete starting point for a conversation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: