You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I agree that "painting area" sounds confusing, though @fantasai already changed that term to "total width". So I guess this issue can already be closed.
a71367a That's good, but I'm now it seems that each consumer of <image-1D> should define both the paint line and the total width. Maybe just define the total width as the length of the paint line?
stripes()
keeps referring to a "painting area", e.g.But this is very confusing since an area is 2D but
stripes()
is a<1d-image>
. And for example,I think it would look like the image below, so the actual areas are in a proportion of 1:4, not 1:1
I think "painting area" should be renamed to something like "length of the paint line".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: