You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't positively checked that this is a regression from 1.0, but I am quite sure that the intent has always been to support this. Alas, there seems to be no such form in the test suite (in fact, no @graph-aliases at all, to my surprise), otherwise it'd been caught.
Crucially though, it does not work according to the JSON-LD 1.1 Expansion Algorithm, where step 13.4 and 13.4.5 creates an expanded value and continues (in 13.4.17), thus bypassing the container processing step at 13.5.
Thus it doesn't work in the faithfully implemented Ruby RDF distiller, nor in TRLD (equally faithfully implemented I hope).
The fix is simple: just exclude @graph in step 13.4 (and thus step 13.4.5 can just be removed). I tried that in the TRLD implementation, and if this is acknowledged, I'd like to fix this in the spec (at least getting it into JSON-LD 1.2).
This appears to work in the compaction algorithm, at least if the expanded graph array is wrapped in a graph object, i.e. given:
Combined with the context from the initial example, and fed into compaction unaltered, that will be compacted into the form of that example.
We may want to clarify that the compaction algorithm must ensure that it is thusly wrapped if it is given an array, or at least spell it out that for compaction using graph aliases to work, it needs that form (with an outer graph object) as input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How this issue gets solved is also important to Verifiable Credentials and "safe mode" or "strict mode" processing. I believe this PR may be related and we will want to ensure a future spec says how to do these things that can be compatible with VCs and "safe mode"/"strict mode" and helps implementations to be in agreement on the behavior.
It appears that
@graph
-aliased keywords don't work as containers in JSON-LD 1.1. Given:I'd expect the following:
I haven't positively checked that this is a regression from 1.0, but I am quite sure that the intent has always been to support this. Alas, there seems to be no such form in the test suite (in fact, no
@graph
-aliases at all, to my surprise), otherwise it'd been caught.This actually works in the JSON-LD 1.1 playground, and in RDFLib.
Crucially though, it does not work according to the JSON-LD 1.1 Expansion Algorithm, where step 13.4 and 13.4.5 creates an expanded value and continues (in 13.4.17), thus bypassing the container processing step at 13.5.
Thus it doesn't work in the faithfully implemented Ruby RDF distiller, nor in TRLD (equally faithfully implemented I hope).
The fix is simple: just exclude
@graph
in step 13.4 (and thus step 13.4.5 can just be removed). I tried that in the TRLD implementation, and if this is acknowledged, I'd like to fix this in the spec (at least getting it into JSON-LD 1.2).This appears to work in the compaction algorithm, at least if the expanded graph array is wrapped in a graph object, i.e. given:
Combined with the context from the initial example, and fed into compaction unaltered, that will be compacted into the form of that example.
We may want to clarify that the compaction algorithm must ensure that it is thusly wrapped if it is given an array, or at least spell it out that for compaction using graph aliases to work, it needs that form (with an outer graph object) as input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: