Skip to content

TTWG Meeting 2019-05-23 #39

@nigelmegitt

Description

@nigelmegitt

Agenda

1. This meeting
2. WebVTT Implementation Report
3. TTML2 and TTML3 Pull Requests
4. TTML Profile Registry
5. AOB – please notify of any other AOB now!
5.1 TTWG Charter status

Time

15:00 - 16:00 (1 hour) UTC

Please be ready for a prompt start at 15:03am UTC time.

Our teleconference is scheduled with reference to UTC Time, the correct time of this teleconference in your locale may change.

Check https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20190523T15&p1=1440

Joining details:

see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2016Oct/0009.html
(members-only link – if you can't see this and wish to join please contact me)

Future meetings and recent activity:

See the TTWG project board for upcoming meetings.

See individual agenda items for recent activity on specific products.

See the TTWG home page for links to repositories and recent activity.


Agenda+ This meeting

Assign Roles

Chairs: Nigel Megitt

Scribe: Cyril

Regrets: Thierry, Andreas

Prioritise discussion for this meeting and look ahead

Check-point for order of topics and any other business.


WebVTT Implementation report

Implementation report: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/WebVTT_Implementation_Report

Does this capture the information needed in a reasonable form?

Web Platform Tests

Specification edits

PR to remove at-risk features: w3c/webvtt#453

Progress towards CR Exit Criteria?


TTML2 and TTML3

Clarify relative profile designator does not use xml:base (#1033). w3c/ttml2#1054

This pull request has been open for a while - can we address the queries?

Character-related style properties should not apply to ruby containers. w3c/ttml2#1043

This has been discussed a few times, most recently there wasn't time to conclude - can we do so now?


TTML Profile Registry

The codecs parameter should have a formal definition of the use of the combination operators. w3c/tt-profile-registry#71


Agenda+ AOB

TTWG Charter status update

Hopefully @plehegar can let us know if there's been progress since last time

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions