Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

standard enrichment workflow #35

Open
lwaldron opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

standard enrichment workflow #35

lwaldron opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@lwaldron
Copy link
Member

We need somewhere a simple vignette documenting recommended standard enrichment workflows using bugsigdb. It could include:

  1. (lower priority): data preparation from a couple of the most popular Bioinformatics pipelines
  2. differential abundance analysis
  3. creating a table of enrichment analysis results

Some simple code should be a high priority so we can use this code (at least 2-3) as the basis for a Shiny app that we would like to have ready in time for manuscript publication.

@lwaldron lwaldron added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 20, 2022
@lwaldron
Copy link
Member Author

lwaldron commented Dec 20, 2022

Concept for bugsigdb (+ eventually bugphyzz?) enrichment analysis web interface:

DAVID-like interface to paste in a list of bugs

  • one NCBI taxid or name per row
  • dropdown to choose DB version
  • how many results to show or significance threshold
  • body site to use as background, with backgrounds?
  • download CSV file of complete results

@lgeistlinger
Copy link
Contributor

We need somewhere a simple vignette documenting recommended standard enrichment workflows using bugsigdb.

This would be best wrapped within a new workflow package.

Concept for bugsigdb (+ eventually bugphyzz?) enrichment analysis web interface

This sounds like an issue for bugsigdb.org. Should we move the discussion there?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants