You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Considering that GTDB taxonomy is a cornerstone for microbial genomics research, I was wondering if there is a possibility to also provide GTDB taxonomy labels, particularly the latest version (v214), within the data from the curatedMetagenomicData package.
If the incorporation is currently out of scope, could you advise on the best approach for users to translate the current MetaPhlAn3 labels to the GTDB labels?
Thank you for considering this feature request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I re-posted my question on bioBakery. Pinging @seandavi to request adding gtdb profiles to the next version (apparently available as of MetaPhlan 4.0.6 - https://github.com/biobakery/MetaPhlAn/releases), pending investigation of how much computation it will add.
Dear curatedMetagenomicData Maintainers,
Considering that GTDB taxonomy is a cornerstone for microbial genomics research, I was wondering if there is a possibility to also provide GTDB taxonomy labels, particularly the latest version (v214), within the data from the curatedMetagenomicData package.
If the incorporation is currently out of scope, could you advise on the best approach for users to translate the current MetaPhlAn3 labels to the GTDB labels?
Thank you for considering this feature request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: