Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature dimension of final classifier #3

Open
insomnia250 opened this issue Sep 23, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Feature dimension of final classifier #3

insomnia250 opened this issue Sep 23, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@insomnia250
Copy link

@wangzheallen Thanks for sharing your interesting work!
I have a little question about the feature dimension of the final SVM classifier.
According to your paper and code, the dimension of vsad code ( i.e. the features for SVM classifier) is 2*len(f)*len(p) , where f denotes descriptors from your scene-PatchNet's feature layer(with dimension
of 100 reduced from1024 ) and p denotes codewords from object-PatchNet's softmax layer(i.e. probabilities with dimension of 256 reduced from 1000 ).
Even if dimension reduction is employed, the feature dimensions for SVM are still very high(say, 2×100×256=51200 according to your paper). Will this cause some problems to the final classification? What do you think? (Let me know if i was wrong somewhere! )
Thanks in advance!

@wangzheallen
Copy link
Owner

Hi insomnia250,

thanks for your interest in our work!
Based on my experiment I have not found anything wrong with the performance with such high dimension. But I never tried to use PCA directly on the '51200' dimensional feature.

And I list the paper with high dimensional feature and get very good performance
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077314216300091
http://xjpeng.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/4/55444193/th15_inria.pdf
http://xjpeng.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/4/55444193/pwqp_eccv14_shvlad.pdf

Zhe

@insomnia250
Copy link
Author

@wangzheallen
OK, I guess I should first try it following your paper any way :). Thanks for your reply!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants