We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we just use whatever the width of the terminal is. It would be nice to be able to constrain it to a smaller width for readability:
ex:
is kinda rough to read whereas something like this (with less naive wrapping) would be nice:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@tshowers-bt an example using word boundary wrapping w/ a set max width
thoughts?
Sorry, something went wrong.
If we did we'd likely want a new top level configuration value: MaxWidth or similar.
Edit: Another question would be - do we want to differentiate wrappable fields from others? Like in show we might not want to do that.
Insomniak47
No branches or pull requests
Currently we just use whatever the width of the terminal is. It would be nice to be able to constrain it to a smaller width for readability:
ex:
is kinda rough to read whereas something like this (with less naive wrapping) would be nice:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: