Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLIENTSPEC #13

Open
matthewhudson opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

CLIENTSPEC #13

matthewhudson opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@matthewhudson
Copy link
Member

This will encourage libraries to conform to standard guidelines for behavior and method naming.

The sixpack A/B testing framework does this well.

@progrium
Copy link
Member

ZeroMQ did this as well. Very effective. See their guidelines too:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:bindings

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Hudson
[email protected]:

This will encourage libraries to conform to standard guidelines for
behavior and method naming.

The sixpackhttps://github.com/seatgeek/sixpack/blob/master/CLIENTSPEC.mdA/B testing framework does this well.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/13
.

Jeff Lindsay
http://progrium.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants