Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aggregating peaks without 10x feature linkage #29

Open
jhong26 opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

aggregating peaks without 10x feature linkage #29

jhong26 opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jhong26
Copy link

jhong26 commented Aug 9, 2023

Hello,
I am analyzing 10x multiome data and looking to aggregate macs2 called peaks so I cannot use the 10x-generated feature_linkage.bedpe file to aggregate peaks. As suggested in a previous post, I plan to use cicero to link peaks to other peaks. However, the 10x feature linkage file also identifies peak-gene links combining with gene expression data from scRNAseq. I wonder if I should combine peak-peak links from cicero with gene-peak links from Signac (LinkPeaks) or Archr (addPeak2GeneLinks) to feed into the MultiVelo's aggregate peaks function. Or should I just use the peak-peak links from cicero?
Thank you,
Jason

@danielee0707
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi. All the above approaches are valid solutions. The second approach can boost the ATAC signal a little bit more. You can create a custom feature_linkage file combining the peak-peak and peak-gene or gene-peak links and run the aggregate peaks function. Because I have actually never used these functions myself, it may be worth checking the quality and confidence of the gene-peak links and then manually setting a threshold for cutoff.

@jhong26
Copy link
Author

jhong26 commented Aug 10, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants