Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance on partially occluded point cloud registration #8

Open
leinxx opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Performance on partially occluded point cloud registration #8

leinxx opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@leinxx
Copy link

leinxx commented Jul 5, 2021

Thanks for the great work and sharing the code for other researchers. I am wondering if you have tested this algorithm on registering partially occluded point clouds with templates. Most 3D scanners are only able to get the 3D information of the front-facing surface of the target object. While we normally have full 3D meshes of the target objects. The distribution matching seems to be based on the assumption that the distribution of two related point clouds are the same. Will this matching of two distribution still generate optimal solution in this case?

Thanks,

Lei

@wetoo-cando
Copy link

@leinxx did you try this out yourself? If yes, can you comment on the results? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants