Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j to v2.0.16 #55

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change OpenSSF
org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j (source, changelog) dependencies patch 2.0.13 -> 2.0.16 OpenSSF Scorecard

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j to v2.0.14 fix(deps): update dependency org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j to v2.0.15 Aug 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/slf4j-monorepo branch from 99a349c to 94deccc Compare August 8, 2024 17:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/slf4j-monorepo branch from 94deccc to 375f04c Compare August 10, 2024 11:48
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j to v2.0.15 fix(deps): update dependency org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j to v2.0.16 Aug 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants