-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing assumptions #432
Comments
Assumptions do not work in multiplatform, so this would have to be a JVM-only feature. |
evant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4) Fixes #432
evant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4) Fixes #432
evant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4) Fixes #432
evant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4) Fixes #432
evant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4) Fixes #432
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi! I'm comparing assertk to assertj and bumped into innability to find assumptions (assumeThat).
Do they exist or are they not yet implemented?
IMO those are quite useful, and should be provided ootb.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: