Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Batch QAQC #158

Open
1 task done
wincowgerDEV opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[Feature]: Batch QAQC #158

wincowgerDEV opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wincowgerDEV
Copy link
Owner

wincowgerDEV commented Dec 1, 2023

Guidelines

  • I agree to follow this project's Contributing Guidelines.

Description

People are currently expected to QAQC their spectra using excel paired with the GUI or run through line after line of code manually. I would like to create a framework and or function in the package and in the app where the user can quickly view the top matches and assign which matches are the best and that label gets stored easily in the metadata. For example what if the second match is the best instead of the first? Maybe I am overthinking or overbuilding this but wanted to put it here to simmer for a while.

Problem

Challenging to QAQC spectral matches currently.

Proposed Solution

Perhaps an extra tab in the app that allows QAQC assignments, also a framework or functions in the package for quickly displaying top x matches if people are manually labeling. In the GUI, we could take advantage of the bad spectral match button and add that as an input to the metadata, then the user just has to find ones they disagree with and relabel them (hopefully much faster than labeling all the good ones), though we could also add a good button.

Alternatives Considered

currently expecting the user to have Excel or something else open and manually relabeling things.

@wincowgerDEV wincowgerDEV added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant