Skip to content

New entity naming or will the naming convention be rolled back? #571

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I've had to remove the logic that suffixed each entry with '#1', '#2', etc when multiple inverters are present: it is incompatible with the HA translation logic and was causing crashes (cfr. #564).

I'm surprised that this "breaks" existing installations like shown in your screenshots. The "unique id" which identifies each entity to HA didn't change, which I thought was sufficient to stay compatible with existing installations 🤔. If anybody has any insights in what has gone wrong here: I'm all ears!

Replies: 3 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@JensenNick
Comment options

Answer selected by JensenNick
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@JensenNick
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants