We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given:
@test = [ a b ]; @test2 = [ c d ]; feature rlig { sub @test by @test2; } rlig; feature liga { sub f i by f_i; } liga;
parser_test responds:
NamedGlyphClass( NamedGlyphClass { name: GlyphClassName("@test"), glyph_class: GlyphClass( [ Single( GlyphRef(name = "a"), ), Single( GlyphRef(name = "b"), ), ], ), }, ) NamedGlyphClass( NamedGlyphClass { name: GlyphClassName("@test2"), glyph_class: GlyphClass( [ Single( GlyphRef(name = "c"), ), Single( GlyphRef(name = "d"), ), ], ), }, ) FeatureDefinition( FeatureDefinition { tag: FeatureTag("rlig"), statements: [ Substitute( Single( Single { prefix: [], glyph_class: GlyphClass( [ ClassRef( GlyphClassName("@test"), ), ], ), suffix: [], replacement: GlyphClass( [ ClassRef( GlyphClassName("@test2"), ), ], ), force_chain: false, }, ), ), ], }, ) FeatureDefinition( FeatureDefinition { tag: FeatureTag("liga"), statements: [ Substitute( Single( Single { prefix: [], glyph_class: GlyphClass( [], ), suffix: [], replacement: GlyphClass( [], ), force_chain: false, }, ), ), ], }, )
The rlig rule and the class definitions look good! The liga rule did not seem to work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Given:
parser_test responds:
The rlig rule and the class definitions look good! The liga rule did not seem to work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: