You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes it would be useful to have the herbivore output resolved not only to the level of HFT but to the level of cohorts.
The struct Fauna::Output::CombinedData currently only has hft_data as a member. In principle, the “output groups” could not only be HFTs but also cohorts. Then there would be a lot of columns in the text table like "bison01", "bison02", etc. It’s not the most elegant solution, but perhaps the easiest. (But compare my thoughts about refactoring output classes in issue #18.)
These variables would be interesting to have by cohort:
individual_density
mass_density
body_fat
mortality
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sometimes it would be useful to have the herbivore output resolved not only to the level of HFT but to the level of cohorts.
The struct
Fauna::Output::CombinedData
currently only hashft_data
as a member. In principle, the “output groups” could not only be HFTs but also cohorts. Then there would be a lot of columns in the text table like "bison01", "bison02", etc. It’s not the most elegant solution, but perhaps the easiest. (But compare my thoughts about refactoring output classes in issue #18.)These variables would be interesting to have by cohort:
individual_density
mass_density
body_fat
mortality
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: