You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, to see this difference, quantitatively, its hard to say. we need a new way, or metric for evaluation. For a perceptual judgement, you can find our banner. When the models are trained with BSDS the predictions are thick, if the model is trained with BIPED, as you can see, the predicted edges are thinner.
In my opnion,weighted celoss may lead net to predict more edge around gt for gain less loss,because the cost from false positive is cheap.Focal loss maybe a good choice,which is briefer than CATS,and it effects in my experiments.
I agree with you. However, when I started in Edge detection, I started tackling the most important problem, which is Dataset for edge detection. Once this problem is solved or at least near to be solved. We can start on optimisation, loss function, and/or deep learning (DL) architecture. At the end, the objective is to make a DL models for edge detection as simpler as the ones for image classification.
I noticed that you said the edge on bsds500-trained model is thick.I want to see.thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: