You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I have a doubt that Bsds edges predicted by Biped dataset training are better, but Bsds metrics are lower during evaluation. Is this because of the gt value of Bsds?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I have a doubt that Bsds edges predicted by Biped dataset training are better, but Bsds metrics are lower during evaluation. Is this because of the gt value of Bsds?
In our next publication we will try to give this answer. In the meantime you can check our last publication LDC. Sorry, I didn't give you a concrete answer.
I think it may be the labeling of the BSDS dataset that causes this problem, because BIPED labels all edges as much as possible, while some edges are ignored in the labeling of BSDS, causing the model trained with BIPED to detect this part of the edges, but BSDS does not have this part of the labeling, which leads to a decrease in metrics.
Maybe I'm wrong, just offering a possible thought
Hi, I have a doubt that Bsds edges predicted by Biped dataset training are better, but Bsds metrics are lower during evaluation. Is this because of the gt value of Bsds?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: