You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following #1, I'd like us to consider parsing or evaluating /etc/os-release rather than relying on the output of uname. This would also allow to add testcases to mk/testcases and then to contribute the detection of FreeBSD upstream.
This is about xe-linux-distribution only, not install.sh.
That's a fine idea, and I'd be happy to do it. But if you look at the FreeBSD source it looks like os-release is a pretty new mechanism. I'm struggling to read the version history in SVN, but it looks like this was created around the time of 12.2-RELEASE. So if we drop uname support, I think we will lose support for some older versions (e.g., 11.X) that are presently supported. I like /etc/os-release as a primary, first choice mechanism, though.
Following #1, I'd like us to consider parsing or evaluating
/etc/os-release
rather than relying on the output ofuname
. This would also allow to add testcases tomk/testcases
and then to contribute the detection of FreeBSD upstream.This is about
xe-linux-distribution
only, notinstall.sh
.CCing @pacohope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: