Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIFAR-100 results #3

Open
adambielski opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

CIFAR-100 results #3

adambielski opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@adambielski
Copy link

I think there's a mistake in README. It looks like the train and validation accuracy are swapped in the curves, and the reported loss, top-1 and top-5 accuracies are for train and not val datasets. If not, then you got a new state-of-the-art on CIFAR-100 ;)

@cvtower
Copy link

cvtower commented Jun 19, 2018

convert.py +line 25&&26
replace
x = X_train[i]
y = y_train[i]
with
x = X_test[i]
y = y_test[i].

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants