You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think there's a mistake in README. It looks like the train and validation accuracy are swapped in the curves, and the reported loss, top-1 and top-5 accuracies are for train and not val datasets. If not, then you got a new state-of-the-art on CIFAR-100 ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think there's a mistake in README. It looks like the train and validation accuracy are swapped in the curves, and the reported loss, top-1 and top-5 accuracies are for train and not val datasets. If not, then you got a new state-of-the-art on CIFAR-100 ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: