-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scale value other than "4" results in garbled output image #37
Comments
Because you are using a model only designed for 4x scaling. scale the image down to the size you want |
Can we get a x2 model please... Pretty Please? |
Simply downscale the image, its not hard
…On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 12:12 PM jdc4429 ***@***.***> wrote:
Can we get a x2 model please... Pretty Please?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#37 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH7EZOJCNAQJ2NCDRB4LX7DXM433DANCNFSM6AAAAAATYUATHY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
It is when your running through 80,000 images and the output is 1.2mb per
pic.. x2 it's s only around 130kb per pic. Plus a lot of times you don't
want the image upscaled that much.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 3:18 p.m. AlphaHasher ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Simply downscale the image, its not hard
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 12:12 PM jdc4429 ***@***.***> wrote:
> Can we get a x2 model please... Pretty Please?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <
#37 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH7EZOJCNAQJ2NCDRB4LX7DXM433DANCNFSM6AAAAAATYUATHY>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#37 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEVP2RARUQFI7P5ZY5EAMG3XM44PRANCNFSM6AAAAAATYUATHY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
When I use anything else than the value 4 for my scale parameter I get the image cut up into 4 sections and bundled together randomly.
Here's an example:
Do you happen to know what is the issue here?
Only with 4 do I get a proper resampled image.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: