You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The "<=" symbol in front of each verbosity level is confusing. First it took me a while to understand the meaning, and then I thought the opposite symbol, ">=", should be used (where I thought ERROR > INFO for example).
Possible implementation
Why don't we remove this symbol? Users understand the convention that a certain verbosity level is inclusive of all higher priority verbosity levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the enhancement request. The <= sign was initially added at the request of engineers who found it confusing without it. On further reflection and discussion with the team, a better way to display this would be to have a slider which shows which levels are included in the log. This would remove any ambiguity and likely be the best solution for new and experienced users. I will share a mockup for discussion before implementing the solution.
Request
The "<=" symbol in front of each verbosity level is confusing. First it took me a while to understand the meaning, and then I thought the opposite symbol, ">=", should be used (where I thought ERROR > INFO for example).
Possible implementation
Why don't we remove this symbol? Users understand the convention that a certain verbosity level is inclusive of all higher priority verbosity levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: