draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-31.xml

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
    <!ENTITY RFC2119 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC2328 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2328.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC3101 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3101.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC3688 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3688.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC4271 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC5130 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5130.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC5246 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5246.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC5302 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5302.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC6020 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6020.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC6241 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6241.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC6242 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6242.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC6991 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6991.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC7950 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7950.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8040 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8040.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8174 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8340 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8340.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8341 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8341.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8342 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8342.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8343 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8343.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8349 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8349.xml'>
    <!ENTITY RFC8446 PUBLIC ''
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8446.xml'>
    ]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<rfc docName="draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-31" ipr="trust200902" category="std">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
  <front>
    <title abbrev="Routing Policy Model">A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy</title>
    <author fullname="Yingzhen Qu" initials="Y" surname="Qu">
      <organization>Futurewei</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>2330 Central Expressway</street>
          <city>Santa Clara</city>
          <code>CA 95050</code>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J" surname="Tantsura">
      <organization>Microsoft</organization>
      <address>
        <email>jefftant.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Acee Lindem" initials="A" surname="Lindem">
      <organization>Cisco</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>301 Midenhall Way</street>
          <city>Cary</city>
          <region>NC</region>
          <code>27513</code>
          <country>US</country>
        </postal>
        <email>acee@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Xufeng Liu" initials="X" surname="Liu">
      <organization>Volta Networks</organization>
      <address>
        <email>xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date/>

    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>RTGWG</workgroup>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines a YANG data model for configuring and
        managing routing policies in a vendor-neutral way. The model 
        provides a generic routing policy framework which can be 
        extended for specific routing protocols using the YANG 'augment'
        mechanism.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction" anchor="intro">
      <t>This document describes a YANG <xref target="RFC7950"/> data model for routing
      policy configuration based on operational usage and best practices in a variety
      of service provider networks.  The model is intended to be vendor-neutral,
      to allow operators to manage policy configuration consistently in 
      environments with routers supplied by multiple vendors.
      </t>
      <t> The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
      Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].</t>

      <section title = "Goals and approach" anchor="goals">
      <t>
      This model does not aim to be feature complete -- it is a
      subset of the policy configuration parameters available
      in a variety of vendor implementations, but supports widely
      used constructs for managing how routes are imported,
      exported, and modified across different routing protocols.
      The model development approach has been to examine actual
      policy configurations in use across several operator
      networks.  Hence, the focus is on enabling policy configuration
      capabilities and structure that are in wide use.
      </t>

      <t>
      Despite the differences in details of policy expressions and
      conventions in various vendor implementations, the model
      reflects the observation that a relatively simple condition-action
      approach can be readily mapped to several existing vendor
      implementations, and also gives operators a familiar and 
      straightforward way to express policy. A side effect of this design 
      decision is that other methods for expressing policies are not 
      considered.
      </t>

     <t>
      Consistent with the goal to produce a data model that is vendor
      neutral, only policy expressions that are deemed to be widely
      available in existing major implementations are included in the
      model.  Those configuration items that are only available from
      a single implementation are omitted from the model with the
      expectation they will be available in separate vendor-provided
      modules that augment the current model.
      </t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology and Notation">
      <t>
      The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
      NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
      "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
      described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/>
      when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <t>Routing policy: A routing policy defines how routes are
      imported, exported, modified, and advertised between routing
      protocol instances or within a single routing protocol instance.</t>
      <t>Policy chain: A policy chain is a sequence of policy definitions. 
        They can be referenced from different contexts.</t>
      <t>Policy statement: Policy statements consist of a set of conditions 
        and actions (either of which may be empty). </t>
      <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC8342"/>:
        <list style="symbols">
          <t>client</t>
          <t>server</t>
          <t>configuration</t>
          <t>system state</t>
          <t>operational state</t>
          <t>intended configuration</t>
        </list>
      </t>

      <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC7950"/>:
        <list style="symbols">
          <t>action</t>
          <t>augment</t>
          <t>container</t>
          <t>container with presence</t>
          <t>data model</t>
          <t>data node</t>
          <t>feature</t>
          <t>leaf</t>
          <t>list</t>
          <t>mandatory node</t>
          <t>module</t>
          <t>schema tree</t>
          <t>RPC (Remote Procedure Call) operation</t>
        </list>
      </t>

      <section title="Tree Diagrams">
        <t>Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation
          defined in <xref target="RFC8340"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec.prefixes" title="Prefixes in Data Node Names">
        <t>
        In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other
        data model objects are often used without a prefix, as long as
        it is clear from the context in which YANG module each name is
        defined. Otherwise, names are prefixed using the standard prefix
        associated with the corresponding YANG module, as shown in
        <xref target="tab.prefixes"/>.
        </t>

        <texttable anchor="tab.prefixes" title="Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules">
          <ttcol>Prefix</ttcol>
          <ttcol>YANG module</ttcol>
          <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
          <c>if</c><c>ietf-interfaces</c><c><xref target="RFC8343"/></c>
          <c>rt</c><c>ietf-routing</c><c><xref target="RFC8349"/></c>
          <c>yang</c><c>ietf-yang-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6991"/></c>
          <c>inet</c><c>ietf-inet-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6991"/></c>
        </texttable>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Model overview" anchor="overview">
      <t>
      The routing policy module has three main parts:
      </t>
      <t>
        <list style="symbols">
          <t>
          A generic framework is provided to express policies as sets of
          related conditions and actions. This includes match sets and actions
          that are useful across many routing protocols.
          </t>
          <t>
          A structure that allows routing protocol models to add
          protocol-specific policy conditions and actions though
          YANG augmentations is also provided.  There is a complete example of this
          for <xref target="RFC4271">BGP</xref> policies in the proposed 
          vendor-neutral <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model">BGP data model</xref>.
          Appendix A provides an example of how an augmentation for BGP policies
          might be accomplished. Note that this section is not normative as the BGP
          model is still evolving.
          </t>
          <t>
          Finally, a reusable grouping is defined for attaching import and
          export rules in the context of routing configuration for different
          protocols, VRFs, etc.  This also enables creation of policy
          chains and expressing default policy behavior. In this document,
          policy chains are sequences of policy definitions that are
	  applied in order (described in <xref target="expression"/>).
          </t>
        </list>
      </t>
      <t>
        The module makes use of the standard Internet types,
        such as IP addresses, autonomous system numbers, etc.,
        defined in <xref target="RFC6991">RFC 6991</xref>.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Route policy expression" anchor="expression">
      <t>
      Policies are expressed as a sequence of top-level policy
      definitions each of which consists of a sequence of policy statements.
      Policy statements in turn consist of simple condition-action
      tuples. Conditions may include multiple match or comparison
      operations, and similarly, actions may include multiple changes to
      route attributes, or indicate a final disposition of accepting
      or rejecting the route.  This structure is shown below.
      </t>

      <figure>
        <artwork>
   +--rw routing-policy
      +--ro match-modified-attributes?   boolean
      +--rw policy-definitions
         +--rw policy-definition* [name]
            +--rw name          string
            +--rw statements
               +--rw statement* [name]
                  +--rw name          string
                  +--rw conditions
                  |     ...
                  +--rw actions
                        ...
        </artwork>
      </figure>

      <section title="Defined sets for policy matching" anchor="sets">
        <t>
        The model provides a collection of generic sets that can be used for
        matching in policy conditions.  These sets are applicable for
        route selection across  multiple routing protocols. They may be
        further augmented by protocol-specific models which have their
        own defined sets. The defined sets include:
        </t>
        <t>
          <list style="symbols">
          <t>
            prefix sets - Each prefix set defines a set of IP prefixes, 
            each with an associated IP prefix and netmask range (or exact length).
          </t>
          <t>
            neighbor sets - Each neighbor set defines a set of neighboring nodes by 
            their IP addresses. A neighbor set is used for selecting routes based on the
            neighbors advertising the routes.
          </t>
          <t>
            tag set - Each tag set defines a set of generic tag values that can be used
            in matches for filtering routes.
          </t>
          </list>
        </t>
        <t>
          The model structure for defined sets is shown below.
        </t>

        <figure>
          <artwork>
    +--rw routing-policy
       +--rw defined-sets
       |  +--rw prefix-sets
       |  |  +--rw prefix-set* [name]
       |  |     +--rw name        string
       |  |     +--rw mode?       enumeration
       |  |     +--rw prefixes
       |  |        +--rw prefix-list* [ip-prefix mask-length-lower
       |  |                            mask-length-upper]
       |  |           +--rw ip-prefix           inet:ip-prefix
       |  |           +--rw mask-length-lower    uint8
       |  |           +--rw mask-length-upper    uint8
       |  +--rw neighbor-sets
       |  |  +--rw neighbor-set* [name]
       |  |     +--rw name       string
       |  |     +--rw address*   inet:ip-address
       |  +--rw tag-sets
       |     +--rw tag-set* [name]
       |        +--rw name         string
       |        +--rw tag-value*   tag-type

          </artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>


      <section title="Policy conditions" anchor="conditions">
        <t>
        Policy statements consist of a set of conditions and actions
        (either of which may be empty).  Conditions are used to
        match route attributes against a defined set (e.g., a prefix
        set), or to compare attributes against a specific value. The 
        default action is to reject-route.
        </t>

        <t>
        Match conditions may be further modified using the
        match-set-options configuration which allows network operators to
        change the behavior of a match. Three options are supported:
        </t>
        <t>
          <list style="symbols">
            <t>ALL - match is true only if the given value matches
              all members of the set.
            </t>
            <t>ANY - match is true if the given value matches any
              member of the set.
            </t>
            <t>INVERT - match is true if the given value does not
              match any member of the given set.
            </t>
          </list>
        </t>
        <t>
        Not all options are appropriate for matching against all
        defined sets (e.g., match ALL in a prefix set does not make sense).
        In the model, a restricted set of match options is used where
        applicable.
        </t>

        <t>
        Comparison conditions may similarly use options to change how
              route attributes should be tested, e.g., for equality or
              inequality, against a given value.
        </t>

        <t>
        While most policy conditions will be added by individual
        routing protocol models via augmentation, this routing policy
        model includes several generic match conditions and the
        ability to test which protocol or mechanism installed a route
        (e.g., BGP, IGP, static, etc.).  The conditions included in
        the model are shown below.
        </t>

        <figure>
          <artwork>
+--rw routing-policy
  +--rw policy-definitions
      +--rw policy-definition* [name]
         +--rw name          string
         +--rw statements
            +--rw statement* [name]
               +--rw conditions
               |  +--rw call-policy?
               |  +--rw source-protocol?
               |  +--rw match-interface
               |  |  +--rw interface?
               |  +--rw match-prefix-set
               |  |  +--rw prefix-set?
               |  |  +--rw match-set-options?
               |  +--rw match-neighbor-set
               |  |  +--rw neighbor-set?
               |  +--rw match-tag-set
               |  |  +--rw tag-set?
               |  |  +--rw match-set-options?
               |  +--rw match-route-type*   identityref
               |     +--rw route-type* 

        </artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section title="Policy actions" anchor="actions">

        <t>
        When policy conditions are satisfied, policy actions are used
        to set various attributes of the route being processed, or to
        indicate the final disposition of the route, i.e., accept or
        reject.</t>

        <t>
        Similar to policy conditions, the routing policy model includes
        generic actions in addition to the basic route disposition
        actions. These are shown below.
        </t>

        <figure>
          <artwork>
    +--rw routing-policy
      +--rw policy-definitions
         +--rw policy-definition* [name]
            +--rw statements
              +--rw statement* [name]
                +--rw actions
                    +--rw policy-result?   policy-result-type
                    +--rw set-metric
                    |  +--rw metric-modification?
                    |  |         metric-modification-type
                    |  +--rw metric?                 uint32
                    +--rw set-metric-type
                    |  +--rw metric-type?   identityref
                    +--rw set-route-level
                    |  +--rw route-level?   identityref
                    +--rw set-route-preference?      uint16
                    +--rw set-tag?               tag-type
                    +--rw set-application-tag?   tag-type
          </artwork>
        </figure>

      </section>

      <section title="Policy subroutines" anchor="subroutines">

        <t>
        Policy 'subroutines' (or nested policies) are
        supported by allowing policy statement conditions to reference
        other policy definitions using the call-policy configuration.
        Called policies apply their conditions and
        actions before returning to the calling policy statement and
        resuming evaluation.  The outcome of the called policy affects
        the evaluation of the calling policy.  If the called policy
        results in an accept-route,
        then the subroutine returns an effective Boolean true value to
        the calling policy.  For the calling policy, this is equivalent
        to a condition statement evaluating to a true value and
        evaluation of the policy continues
        (see <xref target="evaluation"></xref>).  Note that
        the called policy may also modify attributes of the route in
        its action statements. Similarly, a reject-route action
        returns false and the calling policy evaluation will be
        affected accordingly. When the end of the subroutine policy
        statements is reached, the default route disposition
        action is returned (i.e., Boolean false for reject-route).
        Consequently, a subroutine cannot
        explicitly accept or reject a route. Rather, the called policy
        returns Boolean true if its outcome is accept-route or Boolean
        false if its outcome is reject-route. Route
        acceptance or rejection is solely determined by the top-level
        policy.
        </t>

        <t>
        Note that the called policy may itself call other policies (subject
        to implementation limitations).  The model does not prescribe a
        nesting depth because this varies among implementations. For example,
        an implementation may only support a single level of
        subroutine recursion. As with any routing policy construction, care
        must be taken with nested policies to ensure that the effective
        return value results in the intended behavior.  Nested policies
        are a convenience in many routing policy constructions but
        creating policies nested beyond a small number of levels (e.g., 2-3)
        is discouraged. Also, implementations MUST validate
        to ensure that there is no recursion among nested routing policies.
        </t>

      </section>

    </section>

    <section title="Policy evaluation" anchor="evaluation">

      <t>
      Evaluation of each policy definition proceeds by evaluating its
      individual policy statements in order that they are defined.  When all
      the condition statements in a policy statement are satisfied, the
      corresponding action statements are executed.  If the actions
      include either accept-route or reject-route actions,
      evaluation of the current policy definition stops, and no further
      policy statement is evaluated. If there are multiple policies
      in the policy chain, subsequent policies are not
      evaluated.  Policy chains are sequences of
      policy definitions (as described in <xref target="expression"/>).
      </t>

      <t>
      If the conditions are not satisfied, then evaluation proceeds to
      the next policy statement.  If none of the policy statement
      conditions are satisfied, then evaluation of the current policy
      definition stops, and the next policy definition in the chain is
      evaluated. When the end of the policy chain is reached, the
      default route disposition action is performed (i.e., reject-route
      unless an alternate default action is specified for the
      chain).
      </t>

      <t>
      Whether the route's pre-policy attributes are used for
      testing policy statement conditions is dependent on the implementation
      specific value of the match-modified-attributes leaf. If match-modified-attributes 
      is false and actions modify route attributes, these modifications are not used for 
      policy statement conditions.  Conversely, if match-modified-attributes is true and
      actions modify the policy application-specific attributes, the attributes as 
      modified by the policy are used for policy condition statements.
      </t>

    </section>

    <section title="Applying routing policy" anchor="usage">

      <t>
      Routing policy is applied by defining and attaching policy chains
      in various routing contexts.  Policy chains are sequences of
      policy definitions (described in <xref target="expression">
      </xref>). They can be referenced from different contexts. For 
      example, a policy chain could be associated with a routing 
      protocol and used to control its interaction with its protocol 
      peers. Or it could be used to control the interaction between 
      a routing protocol and the local routing information base. 
      A policy chain has an associated direction (import or export), 
      with respect to the context in which it is referenced.</t>
      <t>The routing policy model defines an apply-policy grouping that
      can be imported and used by other models.  As shown below, it
      allows definition of import and export policy chains, as well as
      specifying the default route disposition to be used when no
      policy definition in the chain results in a final decision.
      </t>

      <figure>
        <artwork>
      +--rw apply-policy
      |  +--rw import-policy*
      |  +--rw default-import-policy?   default-policy-type
      |  +--rw export-policy*
      |  +--rw default-export-policy?   default-policy-type
        </artwork>
      </figure>

      <t>
      The default policy defined by the model is to reject the route for
      both import and export policies.
      </t>

    </section>

    <section title="YANG Module and Tree" anchor="models">
      <section anchor="policy.tree" title="Routing Policy Model Tree">
        <t>The tree of the routing policy model is shown below.</t>
    <figure align="left">
      <artwork align="left">  
module: ietf-routing-policy
rw routing-policy
  +--rw defined-sets
  |  +--rw prefix-sets
  |  |  +--rw prefix-set* [name mode]
  |  |     +--rw name        string
  |  |     +--rw mode        enumeration
  |  |     +--rw prefixes
  |  |        +--rw prefix-list* [ip-prefix mask-length-lower 
  |  |                            mask-length-upper]
  |  |           +--rw ip-prefix            inet:ip-prefix
  |  |           +--rw mask-length-lower    uint8
  |  |           +--rw mask-length-upper    uint8
  |  +--rw neighbor-sets
  |  |  +--rw neighbor-set* [name]
  |  |     +--rw name       string
  |  |     +--rw address*   inet:ip-address
  |  +--rw tag-sets
  |     +--rw tag-set* [name]
  |        +--rw name         string
  |        +--rw tag-value*   tag-type
  +--rw policy-definitions
   +--ro match-modified-attributes?   boolean
   +--rw policy-definition* [name]
     +--rw name          string
     +--rw statements
        +--rw statement* [name]
           +--rw name          string
           +--rw conditions
           |  +--rw call-policy?       -> ../../../../../..
           |                           /policy-definitions
           |                           /policy-definition/name
           |  +--rw source-protocol?      identityref
           |  +--rw match-interface
           |  |  +--rw interface?      -> /if:interfaces/interface
           |  |                        /name
           |  +--rw match-prefix-set
           |  |  +--rw prefix-set?     -> ../../../../../../..
           |  |                        /defined-sets/prefix-sets
           |  |                        /prefix-set/name
           |  |  +--rw match-set-options?   match-set-options-type
           |  +--rw match-neighbor-set
           |  |  +--rw neighbor-set?   -> ../../../../../../..
           |  |                        /defined-sets/neighbor-sets
           |  |                        /neighbor-set/name
           |  +--rw match-tag-set
           |  |  +--rw tag-set?        -> ../../../../../../..
           |  |                        /defined-sets/tag-sets
           |  |                        /tag-set/name
           |  |  +--rw match-set-options? match-set-options-type
           |  +--rw match-route-type*     identityref
           +--rw actions
              +--rw policy-result?         policy-result-type
              +--rw set-metric
              |  +--rw metric-modification? metric-modification-type
              |  +--rw metric?                uint32
              +--rw set-metric-type
              |  +--rw metric-type?   identityref
              +--rw set-route-level
              |  +--rw route-level?   identityref
              +--rw set-route-preference?        uint16
              +--rw set-tag?               tag-type
              +--rw set-application-tag?   tag-type
     </artwork>
     </figure> 

     </section>



      <section title="Routing policy model">
      <t>The following RFCs are not referenced in the document text but
        are referenced in the ietf-routing-policy.yang module:
        <xref target="RFC2328"/>, <xref target="RFC3101"/>,
        <xref target="RFC5130"/>, <xref target="RFC5302"/>,
        <xref target="RFC6991"/>, and <xref target="RFC8343"/>.
      </t>
        <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-routing-policy@2021-08-12.yang"
module ietf-routing-policy {

  yang-version "1.1";

  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing-policy";
  prefix rt-pol;

  import ietf-inet-types {
    prefix "inet";
    reference
      "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
  }

  import ietf-yang-types {
    prefix "yang";
    reference
      "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
  }

  import ietf-interfaces {
    prefix "if";
    reference
      "RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface
                 Management (NMDA Version)";
  }

  import ietf-routing {
    prefix "rt";
    reference
      "RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing
                 Management (NMDA Version)";
  }

  organization
    "IETF RTGWG - Routing Area Working Group";
  contact
    "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/>
     WG List:  <mailto: rtgwg@ietf.org>

     Editor:   Yingzhen Qu
               <mailto: yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com>
               Jeff Tantsura
               <mailto: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
               Acee Lindem
               <mailto: acee@cisco.com>
               Xufeng Liu
               <mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>";

  description
    "This module describes a YANG model for routing policy
     configuration. It is a limited subset of all of the policy
     configuration parameters available in the variety of vendor
     implementations, but supports widely used constructs for
     managing how routes are imported, exported, modified and
     advertised across different routing protocol instances or
     within a single routing protocol instance.  This module is
     intended to be used in conjunction with routing protocol
     configuration modules (e.g., BGP) defined in other models.

     This YANG module conforms to the Network Management
     Datastore Architecture (NMDA), as described in RFC 8342.

     Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
     authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
     without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
     the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
     forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
     Relating to IETF Documents
     (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

     This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;
     see the RFC itself for full legal notices.

     The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
     NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT
     RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be
     interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when,
     and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.";

  reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy.";

  revision "2021-08-12" {
    description
      "Initial revision.";
    reference
      "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy Management.";
  }

  /* Identities */

  identity metric-type {
    description
      "Base identity for route metric types.";
  }

  identity ospf-type-1-metric {
    base metric-type;
    description
      "Identity for the OSPF type 1 external metric types. It
       is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-type-2-metric {
    base metric-type;
    description
      "Identity for the OSPF type 2 external metric types. It
       is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity isis-internal-metric {
    base metric-type;
    description
      "Identity for the IS-IS internal metric types. It is only
       applicable to IS-IS routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity isis-external-metric {
    base metric-type;
    description
      "Identity for the IS-IS external metric types. It is only
       applicable to IS-IS routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity route-level {
    description
      "Base identity for route import level.";
  }

  identity ospf-normal {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF importation into normal areas
       It is only applicable to routes imported
       into the OSPF protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-nssa-only {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for the OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) area
       importation. It is only applicable to routes imported
       into the OSPF protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option";
  }

  identity ospf-normal-nssa {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF importation into both normal and NSSA
       areas, it is only applicable to routes imported into
       the OSPF protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option";
  }

  identity isis-level-1 {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for IS-IS Level 1 area importation. It is only
       applicable to routes imported into the IS-IS protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity isis-level-2 {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for IS-IS Level 2 area importation. It is only
       applicable to routes imported into the IS-IS protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity isis-level-1-2 {
    base route-level;
    description
      "Identity for IS-IS importation into both Level 1 and Level 2 
       areas. It is only applicable to routes imported into the IS-IS
       protocol.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity proto-route-type {
    description
      "Base identity for route type within a protocol.";
  }

  identity isis-level-1-type {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for IS-IS Level 1 route type. It is only
       applicable to IS-IS routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity isis-level-2-type {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for IS-IS Level 2 route type. It is only
       applicable to IS-IS routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 5302: Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with
       Two-Level IS-IS";
  }

  identity ospf-internal-type {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF intra-area or inter-area route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-external-type {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF external type 1/2 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-external-t1-type {
    base ospf-external-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF external type 1 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-external-t2-type {
    base ospf-external-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF external type 2 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2";
  }

  identity ospf-nssa-type {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF NSSA type 1/2 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option";
  }

  identity ospf-nssa-t1-type {
    base ospf-nssa-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF NSSA type 1 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option";
  }

  identity ospf-nssa-t2-type {
    base ospf-nssa-type;
    description
      "Identity for OSPF NSSA type 2 route type.
       It is only applicable to OSPF routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option";
  }

  identity bgp-internal {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for routes learned from internal BGP (IBGP).
       It is only applicable to BGP routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
  }

  identity bgp-external {
    base proto-route-type;
    description
      "Identity for routes learned from external BGP (EBGP).
       It is only applicable to BGP routes.";
    reference
      "RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
  }

  /* Type Definitions */

  typedef default-policy-type {
    type enumeration {
      enum accept-route {
        description
          "Default policy to accept the route.";
      }
      enum reject-route {
        description
          "Default policy to reject the route.";
      }
    }
    description
      "Type used to specify route disposition in
       a policy chain. This typedef is used in
       the default import and export policy.";
  }

  typedef policy-result-type {
    type enumeration {
      enum accept-route {
        description
          "Policy accepts the route.";
      }
      enum reject-route {
        description
          "Policy rejects the route.";
      }
    }
    description
      "Type used to specify route disposition in
       a policy chain.";
  }

  typedef tag-type {
    type union {
      type uint32;
      type yang:hex-string;
    }
    description
      "Type for expressing route tags on a local system,
       including IS-IS and OSPF; may be expressed as either decimal
       or hexadecimal integer.";
    reference
      "RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2
       RFC 5130: A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using
                 Administrative Tags";
  }

  typedef match-set-options-type {
    type enumeration {
      enum any {
        description
          "Match is true if given value matches any member
           of the defined set.";
      }
      enum all {
        description
          "Match is true if given value matches all
           members of the defined set.";
      }
      enum invert {
        description
          "Match is true if given value does not match any
           member of the defined set.";
      }
    }
    default any;
    description
      "Options that govern the behavior of a match statement.  The
       default behavior is any, i.e., the given value matches any
       of the members of the defined set.";
  }

  typedef metric-modification-type {
    type enumeration {
      enum set-metric {
        description
          "Set the metric to the specified value.";
      }
      enum  add-metric {
        description
          "Add the specified value to the existing metric.
           If the result overflows the maximum metric
           (0xffffffff), set the metric to the maximum.";
      }
      enum  subtract-metric {
        description
          "Subtract the specified value from the existing metric. If
           the result is less than 0, set the metric to 0.";
      }
    }
    description
      "Type used to specify how to set the metric given the
       specified value.";
  }

  /* Groupings */

  grouping prefix {
    description
      "Configuration data for a prefix definition.

       The combination of mask-length-lower and mask-length-upper
       define a range for the mask length, or single 'exact'
       length if mask-length-lower and mask-length-upper are
       equal.

       Example: 192.0.2.0/24 through 192.0.2.0/26 would be
       expressed as prefix: 192.0.2.0/24,
                    mask-length-lower=24,
                    mask-length-upper=26

       Example: 192.0.2.0/24 (an exact match) would be
       expressed as prefix: 192.0.2.0/24,
                    mask-length-lower=24,
                    mask-length-upper=24

       Example: 2001:DB8::/32 through 2001:DB8::/64 would be
       expressed as prefix: 2001:DB8::/32,
                    mask-length-lower=32,
                    mask-length-upper=64";

    leaf ip-prefix {
      type inet:ip-prefix;
      mandatory true;
      description
        "The IP prefix represented as an IPv6 or IPv4 network
         number followed by a prefix length with an intervening
         slash character as a delimiter. All members of the
         prefix-set MUST be of the same address family as the
         prefix-set mode.";
    }

    leaf mask-length-lower {
      type uint8 {
        range "0..128";
      }
      description
        "Mask length range lower bound. It MUST NOT be less than
         the prefix length defined in ip-prefix.";
    }
    leaf mask-length-upper {
      type uint8 {
        range "1..128";
      }
      must "../mask-length-upper >= ../mask-length-lower" {
        error-message "The upper bound MUST NOT be less"
                    + "than lower bound.";
      }
      description
        "Mask length range upper bound. It MUST NOT be less than
         lower bound.";
    }
  }

  grouping match-set-options-group {
    description
      "Grouping containing options relating to how a particular set
       will be matched.";

    leaf match-set-options {
      type match-set-options-type;
      description
        "Optional parameter that governs the behavior of the
         match operation.";
    }
  }

  grouping match-set-options-restricted-group {
    description
      "Grouping for a restricted set of match operation
       modifiers.";

    leaf match-set-options {
      type match-set-options-type {
        enum any {
          description
            "Match is true if given value matches any
             member of the defined set.";
        }
        enum invert {
          description
            "Match is true if given value does not match
             any member of the defined set.";
        }
      }
      description
        "Optional parameter that governs the behavior of the
         match operation. This leaf only supports matching on
         'any' member of the set or 'invert' the match.
         Matching on 'all' is not supported.";
    }
  }

  grouping apply-policy-group {
    description
      "Top level container for routing policy applications. This
       grouping is intended to be used in routing models where
       needed.";

    container apply-policy {
      description
        "Anchor point for routing policies in the model.
         Import and export policies are with respect to the local
         routing table, i.e., export (send) and import (receive),
         depending on the context.";

      leaf-list import-policy {
        type leafref {
          path "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions/" +
          "rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:name";
          require-instance true;
        }
        ordered-by user;
        description
          "List of policy names in sequence to be applied on
          receiving redistributed routes from another routing protocol
          or receiving a routing update in the current context, e.g.,
          for the current peer group, neighbor, address family, etc.";
      }

      leaf default-import-policy {
        type default-policy-type;
        default reject-route;
        description
          "Explicitly set a default policy if no policy definition
           in the import policy chain is satisfied.";
      }

      leaf-list export-policy {
        type leafref {
          path "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions/" +
            "rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:name";
          require-instance true;
        }
        ordered-by user;
        description
          "List of policy names in sequence to be applied on
          redistributing routes from one routing protocol to another
          or sending a routing update in the current context, e.g.,
          for the current peer group, neighbor, address family, etc.";
      }

      leaf default-export-policy {
        type default-policy-type;
        default reject-route;
        description
          "Explicitly set a default policy if no policy definition
           in the export policy chain is satisfied.";
      }
    }
  }

  container routing-policy {
    description
      "Top-level container for all routing policy.";

    container defined-sets {
      description
        "Predefined sets of attributes used in policy match
         statements.";

      container prefix-sets {
        description
          "Data definitions for a list of IPv4 or IPv6
          prefixes which are matched as part of a policy.";
        list prefix-set {
          key "name mode";
          description
            "List of the defined prefix sets";

          leaf name {
            type string;
            description
              "Name of the prefix set -- this is used as a label to
               reference the set in match conditions.";
          }

          leaf mode {
            type enumeration {
              enum ipv4 {
                description
                  "Prefix set contains IPv4 prefixes only.";
              }
              enum ipv6 {
                description
                  "Prefix set contains IPv6 prefixes only.";
              }
            }
            description
              "Indicates the mode of the prefix set, in terms of
               which address families (IPv4 or IPv6) are present.
               The mode provides a hint, all prefixes MUST be of
               the indicated type. The device MUST validate that
               all prefixes and reject the configuration if there
               is a discrepancy.";
          }

          container prefixes {
            description
              "Container for the list of prefixes in a policy
               prefix list. Since individual prefixes do not have
               unique actions, the order in which the prefix in
               prefix-list are matched has no impact on the outcome
               and is left to the implementation. A given prefix-set
               condition is satisfied if the input prefix matches
               any of the prefixes in the prefix-set.";

            list prefix-list {
              key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
              description
                "List of prefixes in the prefix set.";

              uses prefix;
            }
          }
        }
      }

      container neighbor-sets {
        description
          "Data definition for a list of IPv4 or IPv6
           neighbors which can be matched in a routing policy.";

        list neighbor-set {
          key "name";
          description
            "List of defined neighbor sets for use in policies.";

          leaf name {
            type string;
            description
              "Name of the neighbor set -- this is used as a label
               to reference the set in match conditions.";
          }

          leaf-list address {
            type inet:ip-address;
            description
              "List of IP addresses in the neighbor set.";
          }
        }
      }

      container tag-sets {
        description
          "Data definitions for a list of tags which can
           be matched in policies.";

        list tag-set {
          key "name";
          description
            "List of tag set definitions.";

          leaf name {
            type string;
            description
              "Name of the tag set -- this is used as a label to
              reference the set in match conditions.";
          }

          leaf-list tag-value {
            type tag-type;
            description
              "Value of the tag set member.";
          }
        }
      }
    }

    container policy-definitions {
      description
        "Enclosing container for the list of top-level policy
         definitions.";

      leaf match-modified-attributes {
        type boolean;
        config false;
        description
          "This boolean value dictates whether matches are performed
           on the actual route attributes or route attributes
           modified by policy statements preceding the match.";
      }

      list policy-definition {
        key "name";
        description
          "List of top-level policy definitions, keyed by unique
           name.  These policy definitions are expected to be
           referenced (by name) in policy chains specified in
           import or export configuration statements.";

        leaf name {
          type string;
          description
            "Name of the top-level policy definition -- this name
             is used in references to the current policy.";
        }

        container statements {
          description
            "Enclosing container for policy statements.";

          list statement {
            key "name";
            ordered-by user;
            description
              "Policy statements group conditions and actions
               within a policy definition.  They are evaluated in
               the order specified.";

            leaf name {
              type string;
              description
                "Name of the policy statement.";
            }

            container conditions {
              description
                "Condition statements for the current policy
                 statement.";

              leaf call-policy {
                type leafref {
                  path "../../../../../../" +
                       "rt-pol:policy-definitions/" +
                       "rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:name";
                  require-instance true;
                }
                description
                  "Applies the statements from the specified policy
                   definition and then returns control to the current
                   policy statement. Note that the called policy
                   may itself call other policies (subject to
                   implementation limitations). This is intended to
                   provide a policy 'subroutine' capability.  The
                   called policy SHOULD contain an explicit or a
                   default route disposition that returns an
                   effective true (accept-route) or false
                   (reject-route), otherwise the behavior may be
                   ambiguous.";
              }

              leaf source-protocol {
                type identityref {
                  base rt:control-plane-protocol;
                }
                description
                  "Condition to check the protocol / method used to
                  install the route into the local routing table.";
              }

              container match-interface {
                leaf interface {
                  type leafref {
                    path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name";
                  }
                  description
                    "Reference to a base interface.";
                }
                description
                  "Container for interface match conditions";
              }

              container match-prefix-set {
                leaf prefix-set {
                  type leafref {
                    path "../../../../../../../defined-sets/" +
                         "prefix-sets/prefix-set/name";
                  }
                  description
                    "References a defined prefix set.";
                }
                uses match-set-options-restricted-group;

                description
                  "Match a referenced prefix-set according to the
                   logic defined in the match-set-options leaf.";
              }

              container match-neighbor-set {
                leaf neighbor-set {
                  type leafref {
                    path "../../../../../../../defined-sets/" +
                         "neighbor-sets/neighbor-set/name";
                    require-instance true;
                  }
                  description
                    "References a defined neighbor set.";
                }

                description
                  "Match a referenced neighbor set.";
              }

              container match-tag-set {
                leaf tag-set {
                  type leafref {
                    path  "../../../../../../../defined-sets/" +
                          "tag-sets/tag-set/name";
                    require-instance true;
                  }
                  description
                    "References a defined tag set.";
                }
                uses match-set-options-group;

                description
                  "Match a referenced tag set according to the logic
                   defined in the match-set-options leaf.";
              }

              container match-route-type {
                description
                  "This container provides route-type match condition";

                leaf-list route-type {
                  type identityref {
                    base proto-route-type;
                  }
                  description
                    "Condition to check the protocol-specific type
                     of route. This is normally used during route
                     importation to select routes or to set protocol
                     specific attributes based on the route type.";
                }
              }
            }

            container actions {
              description
                "Top-level container for policy action
                 statements.";
              leaf policy-result {
                type policy-result-type;
                default reject-route;
                description
                  "Select the final disposition for the route,
                   either accept or reject.";
              }
              container set-metric {
                leaf metric-modification {
                  type metric-modification-type;
                  description
                    "Indicates how to modify the metric.";
                }
                leaf metric {
                  type uint32;
                  description
                    "Metric value to set, add, or subtract.";
                }
                description
                  "Set the metric for the route.";
              }
              container set-metric-type {
                leaf metric-type {
                  type identityref {
                    base metric-type;
                  }
                  description
                    "Route metric type.";
                }
                description
                  "Set the metric type for the route.";
              }
              container set-route-level {
                leaf route-level {
                  type identityref {
                    base route-level;
                  }
                  description
                    "Route import level.";
                }
                description
                  "Set the level for importation or
                   exportation of routes.";
              }
              leaf set-route-preference {
                type uint16;
                description
                  "Set the preference for the route. It is also
                   known as 'administrative distance', allows for
                   selecting the preferred route among routes with
                   the same destination prefix. A smaller value is
                   more preferred.";
              }
              leaf set-tag {
                type tag-type;
                description
                  "Set the tag for the route.";
              }
              leaf set-application-tag {
                type tag-type;
                description
                  "Set the application tag for the route.
                   The application-specific tag is an additional tag
                   that can be used by applications that require
                   semantics and/or policy different from that of the
                   tag. For example, the tag is usually automatically
                   advertised in OSPF AS-External Link State
                   Advertisements (LSAs) while this application-specific
                   tag is not advertised implicitly.";
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
<CODE ENDS>
 ]]>
        </artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>


    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
        that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
        as NETCONF <xref target="RFC6241"/> or RESTCONF <xref target="RFC8040"/>.
        The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the
        mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) <xref target="RFC6242"/>.
        The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement
        secure transport is TLS <xref target="RFC8446"/>.</t>

      <t>The NETCONF Access Control Model (NACM) <xref target="RFC8341"/> provides
        the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users
        to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
        operations and content.</t>

      <t>There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
        writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
        default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
        in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
        to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
        effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
        and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
        <list style="empty">
          <t>/routing-policy/defined-sets/prefix-sets -- Modification to 
            prefix-sets could result in a Denial-of-Service (DoS) 
            attack. An attacker may try to modify prefix-sets and redirect 
            or drop traffic. Redirection of traffic could be used as part of
            a more elaborate attack to either collect sensitive
            information or masquerade a service. Additionally, a control-plane
            DoS attack could be accomplished by allowing a large number of
            routes to be leaked into a routing protocol domain (e.g., BGP).</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/defined-sets/neighbor-sets -- Modification to
             the neighbor-sets could be used to mount a DoS attack or more
             elaborate attack as with prefix-sets. For 
             example, a DoS attack could be mounted by changing the
             neighbor-set from which routes are accepted.</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/defined-sets/tag-sets -- Modification to the
            tag-sets could be used to mount a DoS attack. Routes with certain
            tags might be redirected or dropped. The implications are similar to
            prefix-sets and neighbor-sets. However, the attack may be more
            difficult to detect as the routing policy usage of route tags and
            intent must be understood to recognize the breach. Conversely, 
            the implications of prefix-set or neighbor set modification are
            easier to recognize.</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/policy-definitions/policy-definition
             /statements/statement/conditions -- Modification to the conditions
             could be used to mount a DoS attack or other attack.
             An attacker may change a policy condition and redirect or drop traffic.
             As with prefix-sets, neighbor-sets, or tag-sets, traffic redirection
             could be used as part of a more elaborate attack.</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/policy-definitions/policy-definition
             /statements/statement/actions -- Modification to actions could be
             used to mount a DoS attack or other attack. Traffic may
             be redirected or dropped.
              As with prefix-sets, neighbor-sets, or tag-sets, traffic redirection
             could be used as part of a more elaborate attack.
             Additionally, route attributes may be changed to mount a second-level
             attack that is more difficult to detect.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>Some of the readable data nodes in the YANG module may be
        considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.
        It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get,
        get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the
        subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
        <list style="empty">
          <t>/routing-policy/defined-sets/prefix-sets -- Knowledge of
            these data nodes can be used to ascertain which local prefixes
            are susceptible to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack.</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/defined-sets/prefix-sets -- Knowledge of
            these data nodes can be used to ascertain local neighbors
            against whom to mount a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack.</t>
          <t>/routing-policy/policy-definitions/policy-definition
            /statements/ -- Knowledge of these data
             nodes can be used to attack the local router with a
             Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack.  Additionally, policies and
             their attendant conditions and actions should be considered
             proprietary and disclosure could be used to ascertain
             partners, customers, and supplies. Furthermore, the policies
             themselves could represent intellectual property and disclosure
             could diminish their corresponding business advantage.
            </t>
        </list></t>
      <t>Routing policy configuration has a significant impact on network operations,
      and, as such, other YANG models that reference routing policies are also
      susceptible to vulnerabilities relating the YANG data nodes specified above.</t> 

    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">

      <t>This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry
       <xref target="RFC3688"/>.  Following the format in <xref target="RFC3688"/>,
       the following registration is requested to be made:
      <figure>
      <artwork>
        URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing-policy
        Registrant Contact: The IESG.
        XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
      </artwork>
      </figure></t>
      <t>This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
       registry <xref target="RFC6020"/>.
      <figure>
      <artwork>
        name: ietf-routing-policy
        namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing-policy
        prefix: rt-pol
        reference: RFC XXXX
      </artwork>
      </figure></t>

    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>The routing policy module defined in this document is based on the OpenConfig
      route policy model. The authors would like to thank to OpenConfig for their contributions,
      especially Anees Shaikh, Rob Shakir, Kevin D'Souza, and Chris Chase.
    </t>
      <t>The authors are grateful for valuable contributions to this
      document and the associated models from: Ebben Aires, Luyuan Fang,
      Josh George, Stephane Litkowski, Ina Minei,
      Carl Moberg, Eric Osborne, Steve Padgett, Juergen Schoenwaelder,
      Jim Uttaro, Russ White, and John Heasley.
      </t>
      <t>Thanks to Mahesh Jethanandani, John Scudder, Chris Bowers and 
        Tom Petch for their reviews and comments.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>

    <references title="Normative references">
      &RFC2119;
      &RFC2328;
      &RFC3101;
      &RFC3688;
      &RFC4271;
      &RFC5130;
      &RFC5302;
      &RFC6020;
      &RFC6241;
      &RFC6242;
      &RFC6991;
      &RFC7950;
      &RFC8040;
      &RFC8174;
      &RFC8340;
      &RFC8341;
      &RFC8342;
      &RFC8343;
      &RFC8349;
      &RFC8446;
    </references>

    <references title="Informative references">
      <?rfc include="http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model.xml"?>
    </references>


    <section title="Routing protocol-specific policies" anchor="augment">

      <t>
      Routing models that require the ability to apply routing policy
      may augment the routing policy model with protocol or other
      specific policy configuration.  The routing policy model
      assumes that additional defined sets, conditions, and actions
      may all be added by other models.
      </t>

      <t>
      The example below provides an illustration of how another data 
      model can augment parts of this routing policy data model. It uses 
      specific examples from draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09 to show in a 
      concrete manner how the different pieces fit together. This example 
      is not normative with respect to <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model"></xref>. 
      The model similarly augments BGP-specific conditions and actions 
      in the corresponding sections of the routing policy model. In the example below,
      the XPath prefix "bp:" specifies import from the ietf-bgp-policy
      sub-module and the XPath prefix "bt:" specifies import from the ietf-bgp-types
      sub-module <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model"></xref>.
      </t>

      <figure>
        <artwork>
module: ietf-routing-policy
+--rw routing-policy
  +--rw defined-sets
  |  +--rw prefix-sets
  |  |  +--rw prefix-set* [name]
  |  |     +--rw name        string
  |  |     +--rw mode?       enumeration
  |  |     +--rw prefixes
  |  |        +--rw prefix-list* [ip-prefix mask-length-lower
  |  |                            mask-length-upper]
  |  |           +--rw ip-prefix            inet:ip-prefix
  |  |           +--rw mask-length-lower    uint8
  |  |           +--rw mask-length-upper    uint8
  |  +--rw neighbor-sets
  |  |  +--rw neighbor-set* [name]
  |  |     +--rw name       string
  |  |     +--rw address*   inet:ip-address
  |  +--rw tag-sets
  |  |  +--rw tag-set* [name]
  |  |     +--rw name         string
  |  |     +--rw tag-value*   tag-type
  |  +--rw bp:bgp-defined-sets
  |     +--rw bp:community-sets
  |     |  +--rw bp:community-set* [name]
  |     |     +--rw bp:name      string
  |     |     +--rw bp:member*   union
  |     +--rw bp:ext-community-sets
  |     |  +--rw bp:ext-community-set* [name]
  |     |     +--rw bp:name      string
  |     |     +--rw bp:member*   union
  |     +--rw bp:as-path-sets
  |        +--rw bp:as-path-set* [name]
  |           +--rw bp:name      string
  |           +--rw bp:member*   string
  +--rw policy-definitions
     +--ro match-modified-attributes?   boolean
     +--rw policy-definition* [name]
        +--rw name          string
        +--rw statements
           +--rw statement* [name]
              +--rw name          string
              +--rw conditions
              |  +--rw call-policy?
              |  +--rw source-protocol?          identityref
              |  +--rw match-interface
              |  |  +--rw interface?
              |  +--rw match-prefix-set
              |  |  +--rw prefix-set?       prefix-set/name
              |  |  +--rw match-set-options?   match-set-options-type
              |  +--rw match-neighbor-set
              |  |  +--rw neighbor-set?
              |  +--rw match-tag-set
              |  |  +--rw tag-set?
              |  |  +--rw match-set-options?   match-set-options-type
              |  +--rw match-route-type*   identityref
              |  +--rw bp:bgp-conditions
              |     +--rw bp:med-eq?         uint32
              |     +--rw bp:origin-eq?      bt:bgp-origin-attr-type
              |     +--rw bp:next-hop-in*    inet:ip-address-no-zone
              |     +--rw bp:afi-safi-in*    identityref
              |     +--rw bp:local-pref-eq?  uint32
              |     +--rw bp:route-type?     enumeration
              |     +--rw bp:community-count
              |     +--rw bp:as-path-length
              |     +--rw bp:match-community-set
              |     |  +--rw bp:community-set?
              |     |  +--rw bp:match-set-options?
              |     +--rw bp:match-ext-community-set
              |     |  +--rw bp:ext-community-set?
              |     |  +--rw bp:match-set-options?
              |     +--rw bp:match-as-path-set
              |        +--rw bp:as-path-set?
              |        +--rw bp:match-set-options?
              +--rw actions
                 +--rw policy-result?         policy-result-type
                 +--rw set-metric
                 |  +--rw metric-modification?
                 |  +--rw metric?                uint32
                 +--rw set-metric-type
                 |  +--rw metric-type?   identityref
                 +--rw set-route-level
                 |  +--rw route-level?   identityref
                 +--rw set-route-preference?        uint16
                 +--rw set-tag?               tag-type
                 +--rw set-application-tag?   tag-type
                 +--rw bp:bgp-actions
                    +--rw bp:set-route-origin?bt:bgp-origin-attr-type
                    +--rw bp:set-local-pref?   uint32
                    +--rw bp:set-next-hop?     bgp-next-hop-type
                    +--rw bp:set-med?          bgp-set-med-type
                    +--rw bp:set-as-path-prepend
                    |  +--rw bp:repeat-n?   uint8
                    +--rw bp:set-community
                    |  +--rw bp:method?      enumeration
                    |  +--rw bp:options?
                    |  +--rw bp:inline
                    |  |  +--rw bp:communities*   union
                    |  +--rw bp:reference
                    |     +--rw bp:community-set-ref?
                    +--rw bp:set-ext-community
                       +--rw bp:method?      enumeration
                       +--rw bp:options?
                       +--rw bp:inline
                       |  +--rw bp:communities*   union
                       +--rw bp:reference
                          +--rw bp:ext-community-set-ref?
        </artwork>
      </figure>

    </section>
    
    <section title="Policy examples" anchor="examples">

      <t>
      Below we show examples of XML-encoded configuration data using
      the routing policy and BGP models to illustrate both how policies
      are defined, and how they can be applied.  Note that the XML
      has been simplified for readability.
      </t>
      <t>The following example shows how prefix-set and tag-set can be
      defined. The policy condition is to match a prefix-set and a
      tag-set, and the action is to accept routes that match the condition.</t>
      
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
  <config xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
    <routing-policy
     xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing-policy">

        <defined-sets>
          <prefix-sets>
            <prefix-set>
              <name>prefix-set-A</name>
              <mode>ipv4</mode>
              <prefixes>
                <prefix-list>
                  <ip-prefix>192.0.2.0/24</ip-prefix>
                  <mask-length-lower>24</mask-length-lower>
                  <mask-length-upper>32</mask-length-upper>
                </prefix-list>
                <prefix-list>
                  <ip-prefix>198.51.100.0/24</ip-prefix>
                  <mask-length-lower>24</mask-length-lower>
                  <mask-length-upper>32</mask-length-upper>
                </prefix-list>
              </prefixes>
            </prefix-set>
            <prefix-set>
              <name>prefix-set-B</name>
              <mode>ipv6</mode>
                <prefixes>
                <prefix-list>
                  <ip-prefix>2001:DB8::/32</ip-prefix>
                  <mask-length-lower>32</mask-length-lower>
                  <mask-length-upper>64</mask-length-upper>
                </prefix-list>
              </prefixes>
            </prefix-set>
           </prefix-sets>
           <tag-sets>
            <tag-set>
             <name>cust-tag1</name>
             <tag-value>10</tag-value>
           </tag-set>
         </tag-sets>
       </defined-sets>

       <policy-definitions>
        <policy-definition>
          <name>export-tagged-BGP</name>
          <statements>
            <statement>
              <name>term-0</name>
              <conditions>
                <match-prefix-set>
                  <prefix-set>prefix-set-A</prefix-set>
                </match-prefix-set>
                <match-tag-set>
                  <tag-set>cust-tag1</tag-set>
                </match-tag-set>
              </conditions>
              <actions>
                <policy-result>accept-route</policy-result>
              </actions>
            </statement>
          </statements>
        </policy-definition>
      </policy-definitions>

      </routing-policy>
</config>
 ]]>
        </artwork>
      </figure>

      <t>In the following example, all routes in the RIB that have been 
        learned from OSPF advertisements corresponding to OSPF 
        intra-area and inter-area route types should get advertised 
        into ISIS level-2 advertisements.</t>
        <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
<config xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
  <routing-policy
   xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing-policy">
   <policy-definitions>
    <policy-definition>
     <name>export-all-OSPF-prefixes-into-ISIS-level-2</name>
      <statements>
       <statement>
         <name>term-0</name>
         <conditions>
           <match-route-type>ospf-internal-type</match-route-type>
         </conditions>
         <actions>
           <set-route-level>     
             <route-level>isis-level-2</route-level>
           </set-route-level>
           <policy-result>accept-route</policy-result>
         </actions>
       </statement>
      </statements>
    </policy-definition>
   </policy-definitions>
  </routing-policy>
</config>
 ]]>
        </artwork>
      </figure>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>