Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AY-7211_tyCache modifier #26

Open
ynbot opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #27
Open

AY-7211_tyCache modifier #26

ynbot opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #27
Assignees
Labels
sponsored This is directly sponsored by a client or community member type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition

Comments

@ynbot
Copy link
Contributor

ynbot commented Nov 26, 2024

Please describe the enhancement you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?

new tycache modifier that's just been released with the latest tyFlow version 1.120. It will need supporting with AYON
Image

How would you imagine the implementation of the enhancemenent?

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered:

No response

Additional context:

link to discussion on Discord
(might be a private channel)

This issue was automatically created from Clickup ticket AY-7211

@ynbot ynbot added sponsored This is directly sponsored by a client or community member type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition labels Nov 26, 2024
@moonyuet
Copy link
Member

moonyuet commented Nov 26, 2024

More info for this: https://docs.tyflow.com/tyflow_modifiers/tyCache/
Some pesudocodes

container_node = rt.Container(name=node)
modifier = rt.tyCachemodifier()
rt.addModifier(container_node , modifier)

@moonyuet moonyuet linked a pull request Nov 27, 2024 that will close this issue
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sponsored This is directly sponsored by a client or community member type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants