Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review: Support OpenGL with "source" set to LOPs #170

Open
1 task done
BigRoy opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Review: Support OpenGL with "source" set to LOPs #170

BigRoy opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition

Comments

@BigRoy
Copy link
Contributor

BigRoy commented Nov 10, 2024

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and added correct labels.

Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?

Currently the review product type using the OpenGL ROP only allows publishing from object level and not from LOPs (Solaris).

Suggested implementation?

It should completely support the LOPs setup for publishing:

Image

  1. All validations should pass fine, and preferably a validator validates the ROPs configuration is correct and is capable of rendering (e.g. correct camera set, etc.)
  2. The (animated) focal length collection should be support the Solaris camera so it can be applied in the burnins

There was once a draft in OpenPype, see here: ynput/OpenPype#4890

Describe alternatives you've considered:

A workaround would be publish review from lopimportcam on /obj level instead as requested here: #23 - which would be implemented by #169 however we should just support native Solaris OpenGL render instead.

This also came up in #167 here: #167 (comment)

@BigRoy BigRoy added the type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition label Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants