Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validator for viewer's Input process nodes #34

Open
2 tasks done
jakubjezek001 opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

Validator for viewer's Input process nodes #34

jakubjezek001 opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition

Comments

@jakubjezek001
Copy link
Member

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues.

Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?

The Extract Intermediate Files Publishing plugin needs to check if any viewers in the scene are not referencing existing input process (IP) nodes. If these nodes exist, they are used for baking the look into intermediate files.

In Nuke's viewer workflow, multiple viewers can be part of one node graph. These viewers might be copied from a different workfile with incorrect or nonexistent node references in the input process (IP). Currently, if this issue occurs, the Extract Intermediate plugin fails to process and gives the user a cryptic message, making it unclear what happened.

How would you imagine the implementation of the feature?

We should collect viewers and validate them for existing IP-referenced nodes. If any fail validation, we can offer a repair action. This action would remove the IP node name from the viewer.

Are there any labels you wish to add?

  • I have added the relevant labels to the enhancement request.

Describe alternatives you've considered:

No response

Additional context:

No response

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 added the type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition label Oct 23, 2024
@BigRoy
Copy link
Contributor

BigRoy commented Oct 23, 2024

Relevant private discussions:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants