We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者您好,我尝试在windows环境下测试razor bbr在弱网环境下的带宽探测性能。本地电脑向远程虚机发送模拟视频数据,利用netlimiter限制本地网络的带宽为4M、2M、1M和0.5M分别进行测试,这些带宽为ground truth。我打印下面的数据信息,并作max bandwidth与时间的关系图。我想问一下为什么带宽探测值波动会这么大呀。
之后,我在ns3中对linux tcp bbr进行了仿真测试,这次我是在2M-1.5M-1M-0.5M这样一个链路带宽动态变化的仿真环境中测试的,结果如下: 理论上来说,基于quic bbr的razor bbr得到的结果图应该是当带宽不变时,其探测到的瓶颈带宽是不变的,至少不能出现那么大的波动。是我打印带宽信息的代码的位置不对吗?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
作者您好,我尝试在windows环境下测试razor bbr在弱网环境下的带宽探测性能。本地电脑向远程虚机发送模拟视频数据,利用netlimiter限制本地网络的带宽为4M、2M、1M和0.5M分别进行测试,这些带宽为ground truth。我打印下面的数据信息,并作max bandwidth与时间的关系图。我想问一下为什么带宽探测值波动会这么大呀。

之后,我在ns3中对linux tcp bbr进行了仿真测试,这次我是在2M-1.5M-1M-0.5M这样一个链路带宽动态变化的仿真环境中测试的,结果如下:
理论上来说,基于quic bbr的razor bbr得到的结果图应该是当带宽不变时,其探测到的瓶颈带宽是不变的,至少不能出现那么大的波动。是我打印带宽信息的代码的位置不对吗?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: