Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name of this repo #1

Open
jakirkham opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Name of this repo #1

jakirkham opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Called it governance for no particular reason. Another option might be zarr-governance. There could be other reasonable names I've ignored. Please feel free to suggest.

@alimanfoo
Copy link
Member

alimanfoo commented Mar 1, 2019 via email

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah it's just difficult when forking as other things use similar names making it harder to track what a repo came from. Though no strong feelings about this as it is easy to fix on user's end by renaming the fork. Just might be easier not to need to rename forks at all.

@alimanfoo
Copy link
Member

Thinking about this again, I think it might be nice to rename this repo to "community" or "zarr-community". We would keep the idea that governance docs go here, but also other content related to community and outreach could live here too, i.e., it would be a focus for community activity and coordination. E.g., submissions to conferences, slide decks. Also e.g., the issue relating to the regular telecon could live here rather than in the "zarr" repo which currently holds the Python implementation.

Any objections to any of the following:

@alimanfoo
Copy link
Member

cc @zarr-developers/core-devs

@mzjp2
Copy link
Member

mzjp2 commented Apr 24, 2019

I like that idea, gives a clean split between the two repos

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Personally I’d prefer to separate these. Namely a governance repo with just governance docs and CoC. A repo with outreach material slides, logos, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants