Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZEP0001 status clarification, not "Final"? #265

Closed
mkitti opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

ZEP0001 status clarification, not "Final"? #265

mkitti opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@mkitti
Copy link
Contributor

mkitti commented Sep 20, 2023

#260 and #261 marked ZEP0001 as Accepted.

image

ZEP0000 suggests that the status should now be Final.

Once a Specification ZEP has been Accepted, the second PR which was submitted in the zarr-specs repository must be merged. After that, the status will be changed to Final.

However, #263 and #264 seem to be approaching ZEP0001 as if it were Provisionally Accepted which is a state which is not supposed to apply to "core" specifications.

What kind of changes are permitted to ZEP0001 when it is Accepted but not yet Final? When does ZEP0001 become Final? Are (minor) breaking changes are permitted in the Final state?

@mkitti
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkitti commented Oct 26, 2023

@MSanKeys963 , ping. Could you clarify the current state.

@MSanKeys963
Copy link
Member

Hi @mkitti. 👋🏻

Could you clarify the current state

Yes!

As discussed in the last ZEP meeting (rolling notes here), the ZEP0001 is currently Accepted by the ZIC and ZSC.
Please check #227 for the votes.

The ZIC are currently in the implementation phase, and we're in a grace period (which will end soon) to accept minor changes to the specification.

Once we're sure that the implementors propose no additional changes, we will do a quick round of voting, and after that ZEP0001 will be Final.

I hope that helps. Please let me know if there's anything else.

@MSanKeys963
Copy link
Member

Closing this now.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

With the caveat, @MSanKeys963, that explanations like the above should be backported to ZEP0000 itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants