You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in #331, it would be nice to have a generic mechanism to add metadata to Zeek events. @awelzel sketched the following:
One more thought: Could we go for a a more extensible header-style field instead of the atomic field that is just a timestamp? That is, append a vector<vector<count, data>> where the count identifies what's contained.
Mainly, while the current idea is to only attach network time to an event, what if in the future more information is need or different approaches want to be evaluated? That would require another broker change and another round of appending-a-field-trying-to-stay-compatible. An extensible header format avoids that at the cost of extra complexity.
So the event headers (maybe there's a better name) would just be the following currently and populated up in Zeek land: Broker wouldn't actually need to know about about TIMESTAMP_NETWORK - that's a const up in Zeek land.
As discussed in #331, it would be nice to have a generic mechanism to add metadata to Zeek events. @awelzel sketched the following:
Some use cases @awelzel and @ckreibich brought up in the discussion:
And as Christian pointed out:
This probably relates to #340.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: