Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FrameBuffer expects <= 32, running a 64 x 64 panel #17

Open
jcomack opened this issue Feb 15, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

FrameBuffer expects <= 32, running a 64 x 64 panel #17

jcomack opened this issue Feb 15, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@jcomack
Copy link

jcomack commented Feb 15, 2018

As the title suggests, I'm trying to run a 64 x 64 panel with this library. However, whenever I try to initialize my panel in the constructor and run the code, I receive a message stating that the FrameBuffer is expecting a size that is <= 32.

Is there anywhere I can alter this or is the code incompatible with 64 x 64 panels?

Thanks :)

@hzeller
Copy link
Contributor

hzeller commented Feb 17, 2018

  • What version of the library you are using (i.e. what version of the underlying rpi-rgb-led-matrix library).
  • How did you wire it up ? (because depending on the panel it requires one more wire)
  • What were the command line flags you were giving or values you set in RGBMatrix::Options ?

@hzeller
Copy link
Contributor

hzeller commented Feb 17, 2018

Ah, I see, you already filed rpi-rgb-led-matrix/519 - let's discuss the details there. But I think it boils down to refreshing this node.js library to use the latest version of the base library.

@natcl
Copy link

natcl commented Mar 21, 2018

Any updates on this ?

@hzeller
Copy link
Contributor

hzeller commented Mar 21, 2018

Looks like @zeitungen is busy with other stuff, so some of the users of this node.jd library need to step up and send him a pull request that integrates the latest version of the rpi-rgb-led-matrix

@natcl
Copy link

natcl commented Mar 21, 2018

No promises but I'll have a look.

@jcomack
Copy link
Author

jcomack commented May 25, 2018

Just checking in again; My current project that could use this change wasn't under active development lately, but I'd like to pick it up again... @natcl Did you have a chance to look into this yet? :)

@natcl
Copy link

natcl commented May 25, 2018

Sadly no :/ Don't have much time currently.
I was able to use it from nodejs via the ledcat binary though. Not ideal but it works !

@clowrey
Copy link

clowrey commented Sep 4, 2018

#18
Should resolve these issues! hope it gets merged soon. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants