You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I am using your convertor, successfully, but have noticed one issue: If I am using the default google size, - the quality is very poor.
Once I "resize to fit" (middle control icon_ - the quality is much better (file is also larger).
I have experimented with full zoom (the "+" control button - to the max zoom ) - and it produced even larger file with a little bit better quality.
Can you fix your first script , to adjust the size (possibly to "fit" ) before starting to process the pages?
And a quick question - is it possible not to visibly scroll the document during processing? I think it will achieve a faster speed.
Thanks for the useful tool!
Rafi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possible solutions to force Google to deliver better image quality:
Trigger the "Optimum size" button – wasn't able to do this, even though I grabbed the button by window.querySelector("div[aria-label^=Optim]")
Set window.devicePixelRatio to a higher-than-real value like 6 to make Google deliver pictures for a very high-res screen – tested and works
Modify or the HTTP requests that go to drive.google.com when the actual image files are requested, set the width parameter w=1600 – difficult and untested
Hi,
I am using your convertor, successfully, but have noticed one issue: If I am using the default google size, - the quality is very poor.
Once I "resize to fit" (middle control icon_ - the quality is much better (file is also larger).
I have experimented with full zoom (the "+" control button - to the max zoom ) - and it produced even larger file with a little bit better quality.
Can you fix your first script , to adjust the size (possibly to "fit" ) before starting to process the pages?
And a quick question - is it possible not to visibly scroll the document during processing? I think it will achieve a faster speed.
Thanks for the useful tool!
Rafi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: