You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, shouldn't the zero point in SW Jacobian be any point of the form (t^2:t^3:0) with t <> 0 (conventionally represented with (1:1:0)), instead of (0:1:0), which is actually the zero point in SWProjective ?
Originally the code was using projective formulas, and I actually think I might switch to them (after some benchmarks) but I wanted to have an implementation with Jacobian to benchmark against after other optimizations have been written, that way I know it's worth it. (#2)
The choice of representation here doesn't matter though. The API does not provide access to the raw coordinates, so this can be switched later without breaking anything.
Hi, shouldn't the zero point in SW Jacobian be any point of the form (t^2:t^3:0) with t <> 0 (conventionally represented with (1:1:0)), instead of (0:1:0), which is actually the zero point in SWProjective ?
bls12_381/src/g1.rs
Line 516 in e32494e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: