From ce9c841dd8a5ab25ac4499b9379b19bf44a84019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zpuckeridge Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:15:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] feat: allow side notes to accept children --- _content/is-gods-love-reckless.mdx | 14 ++++++++++---- components/link-with-icon.tsx | 2 +- components/side-note.tsx | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/_content/is-gods-love-reckless.mdx b/_content/is-gods-love-reckless.mdx index e83807d8..06641812 100644 --- a/_content/is-gods-love-reckless.mdx +++ b/_content/is-gods-love-reckless.mdx @@ -24,10 +24,16 @@ Many people are quick to defend the use of the word with the following argument: Cory Asbury himself also came out with a defence for the use of the word 'reckless': - - > "When I use the phrase, 'the reckless love of God', I’m not saying that God - Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many - regards, quite so." — Cory Asbury + + Link to full statement + + } +> + > "When I use the phrase, “the reckless love of God”, I’m not saying that God + > Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many + > regards, quite so." — Cory Asbury Firstly, to understand the controversy and why there is an issue with the word, we must look at the definition of 'reckless'. diff --git a/components/link-with-icon.tsx b/components/link-with-icon.tsx index b8128797..f5dc0969 100644 --- a/components/link-with-icon.tsx +++ b/components/link-with-icon.tsx @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ const LinkWithIcon = ({ {children} diff --git a/components/side-note.tsx b/components/side-note.tsx index 0927a6ef..d977afcb 100644 --- a/components/side-note.tsx +++ b/components/side-note.tsx @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { FC } from "react"; interface SideNoteProps { children: React.ReactNode; - note: string; + note: React.ReactNode; } const SideNote: FC = ({ children, note }) => {