feat: implement SQL lite storage

[Stefan-Ethernal]

What does this PR do?

This PR introduces SQL lite storage to the zkevm-eth-txmanager, in case the PersistenceFilename config param is provided.

Reviewers

Main reviewers:

• @ToniRamirezM
• @goran-ethernal

[joanestebanr]

I'm wondering if make sense to support dbTx?

[Stefan-Ethernal]

I'm wondering if make sense to support dbTx?

Can you elaborate some more? Do you mean to be able to do multiple changes in the same transaction (basically to ensure transactional mode)?

IMO, probably doesn't make too much sense, because it is only a single table, but I'm not sure (it depends of the usage). There might be some valid use case for it 🤔

[joanestebanr]

I'm wondering if make sense to support dbTx?

Can you elaborate some more? Do you mean to be able to do multiple changes in the same transaction (basically to ensure transactional mode)?

IMO, probably doesn't make too much sense, because it is only a single table, but I'm not sure (it depends of the usage). There might be some valid use case for it 🤔

I don't known that is done internally but even with just 1 table make sense:

• You do multiples INSERTS but want to rollback if any of them fails
• You do some INSERTS and check something over them in another function (that need to be in the same set of data)
  Basically, it depends how works internally. But in the future make sense, that if we modify it, we think in that model because is the common in the rest of Database usage

[Stefan-Ethernal]

I don't known that is done internally but even with just 1 table make sense:

You do multiples INSERTS but want to rollback if any of them fails
You do some INSERTS and check something over them in another function (that need to be in the same set of data)
Basically, it depends how works internally. But in the future make sense, that if we modify it, we think in that model because is the common in the rest of Database usage

I discussed this with @goran-ethernal and @joanestebanr, there is no use case, where we would benefit from introducing transactional model. The transactions are affected one by one.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
66.3% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud