Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pid 2289 support jws packer #686

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

martinsaporiti
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@martinsaporiti martinsaporiti added enhancement New feature or request backend labels Jul 5, 2024
@martinsaporiti martinsaporiti self-assigned this Jul 5, 2024
@martinsaporiti martinsaporiti requested a review from a team as a code owner July 5, 2024 14:44
@x1m3 x1m3 added the do not merge Please, do not merge it. label Jul 26, 2024
@vmidyllic
Copy link
Contributor

do we really need to support signer with bjj on the issuer node?

@martinsaporiti
Copy link
Contributor Author

do we really need to support signer with bjj on the issuer node?

good catch, thanks

@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ func main() {
}

publisher := gateways.NewPublisher(storage, identityService, claimsService, mtService, keyStore, transactionService, proofService, publisherGateway, networkResolver, ps)
packageManager, err := protocol.InitPackageManager(ctx, networkResolver.GetSupportedContracts(), cfg.Circuit.Path)
packageManager, err := protocol.InitPackageManager(ctx, networkResolver.GetSupportedContracts(), cfg.Circuit.Path, auth.UniversalDIDResolver)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is better to provide an ability to configure and pass it both to auth verifier and here, so production will not rely on dev instance of third party project. (as fallback it is ok)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

solved

Copy link
Contributor

@x1m3 x1m3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@martinsaporiti martinsaporiti merged commit 1137e2f into develop-v2 Sep 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@martinsaporiti martinsaporiti deleted the PID-2289-support-jws-packer branch September 20, 2024 08:56
@x1m3 x1m3 removed the do not merge Please, do not merge it. label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants