Pin workflows hash #108
Pin workflows hash #108
Conversation
Prevent changing them without updating.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #108 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 185 185
Branches 17 17
=========================================
Hits 185 185 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe pull request implements updates to the GitHub Actions workflows by changing the version references for specific actions used in multiple jobs. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
45-45: Consider removing the outdated "# main" commentThe hash pinning change is good and aligns with security best practices. However, the trailing comment
# mainis now outdated and might cause confusion.- uses: 5ouma/utils/setup-bun-with-cache@6b0f1acc62243ae009e5174cf2a9a39b75bec46e # main + uses: 5ouma/utils/setup-bun-with-cache@6b0f1acc62243ae009e5174cf2a9a39b75bec46e.github/workflows/preview.yml (2)
26-26: Remove outdated "# main" commentThe hash pinning is consistent with other workflows, but the trailing comment should be removed.
26-26: ✅ Hash pinning implementation looks goodThe implementation consistently pins the
setup-bun-with-cacheaction to the same commit hash across all workflows, which:
- Prevents unintended changes from upstream updates
- Ensures reproducible builds
- Follows security best practices by avoiding floating references
Note: When updating the action in the future, remember to update all instances of the hash across these workflow files.
Consider adding a comment with a link to the commit or release notes for future reference when updating the hash.
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
29-29: 💡 Codebase verification
Update setup-bun-with-cache to the latest commit and remove outdated comments
The current hash
6b0f1acc62243ae009e5174cf2a9a39b75bec46eis outdated. The repository has a newer commit13661aa27741f7c7771ace67ad008d1931dd01b7on the main branch. You should:
- Update the hash to
13661aa27741f7c7771ace67ad008d1931dd01b7in all instances (lines 29, 46, 60, 88)- Remove the outdated
# maincomments as they don't provide value when using commit hashes🔗 Analysis chain
Remove outdated "# main" comments across all jobs
The hash pinning is consistent across all jobs and matches the release workflow. However, all instances have the outdated
# maincomment that should be removed.Let's verify the commit hash exists and is the latest stable version:
Also applies to: 46-46, 60-60, 88-88
Let me verify if this is the latest commit in the repository:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the commit hash exists in the repository gh api \ -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ repos/5ouma/utils/commits/6b0f1acc62243ae009e5174cf2a9a39b75bec46e \ --jq '.sha'Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the latest commit SHA from the main branch gh api \ -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ repos/5ouma/utils/commits/main \ --jq '.sha'Length of output: 131
close #
✏️ Description
Prevent changing them without updating.
🔄 Type of the Change