-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the correct HTML tags #26
Conversation
Improve a11y reliability.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #26 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 153 153
Branches 16 16
=========================================
Hits 153 153 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
🔦 Lighthouse Result
📊 Score Scale
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces structural and stylistic changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/Bio/Bio.test.ts (1)
13-14
: Consider adding more accessibility-focused test cases.While the current tests verify the basic structure, consider adding assertions to verify:
- Proper heading hierarchy (h1 should be the first heading)
- ARIA attributes if present
- Proper nesting of semantic elements
Example addition:
test(name, async () => { const container: AstroContainer = await AstroContainer.create(); const result: string = await container.renderToString(Bio, { props }); expect(result).toContain(`>${props.name}</h1>`); expect(result).toContain(`>${props.description}</p>`); expect(result).toContain(`<img src="${props.icon}"`); expect(result).toContain(`${props.name}'s avatar`); + // Verify heading hierarchy + expect(result.indexOf('<h1')).toBeLessThan(result.indexOf('<h2')); + // Verify proper nesting + expect(result).toMatch(/<article[^>]*>.*<h1.*<\/article>/s); });src/components/Bio/Bio.astro (2)
14-15
: Consider adding ARIA attributes to the profile sectionTo further enhance accessibility, consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes to the profile section.
- <div id="profile"> + <div id="profile" role="banner" aria-labelledby="name">
51-59
: Consider using responsive font sizesThe fixed font sizes could cause issues on different viewport sizes. Consider using relative units or fluid typography.
h1 { - font-size: 2.5rem; + font-size: clamp(2rem, 5vw, 2.5rem); font-weight: bold; } p { - font-size: 0.9rem; + font-size: clamp(0.875rem, 2vw, 0.9rem); font-weight: normal; white-space: pre-line; }src/pages/index.astro (2)
30-30
: Consider using responsive marginsWhile changing padding to margin is fine, a fixed 3rem margin might not be optimal for all viewport sizes.
Consider using a responsive approach:
- margin: 3rem; + margin: clamp(1.5rem, 5vw, 3rem);
16-18
: Consider enhancing interactive feedbackSince these list items contain interactive Contact components, consider adding hover and focus states for better user feedback.
Add interactive states:
li { list-style: none; + transition: transform 0.2s ease; } + + li:hover, + li:focus-within { + transform: translateX(0.5rem); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/Bio/Bio.astro
(2 hunks)src/components/Bio/Bio.test.ts
(1 hunks)src/pages/index.astro
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/Bio/Bio.test.ts (1)
13-14
: LGTM! Good semantic HTML updates.
The test assertions correctly reflect the component's improved accessibility through semantic HTML tags (h1
for name and p
for description).
src/components/Bio/Bio.astro (4)
Line range hint 5-10
: LGTM: Well-structured Props type definition
The Props type definition provides good type safety and clear documentation of the component's required properties.
17-19
: Great improvement using semantic HTML elements!
The change from span
to h1
and p
tags significantly improves accessibility by providing proper document structure and semantic meaning to screen readers.
42-50
: LGTM: Clean style organization
Good approach combining styles for both heading and paragraph while maintaining specific properties where needed.
Line range hint 1-62
: Verify accessibility improvements with automated testing
Since this PR focuses on accessibility improvements, it would be beneficial to verify these changes with automated testing tools.
Would you like me to help set up automated accessibility testing for this component?
src/pages/index.astro (2)
11-21
: Great improvement in semantic HTML structure!
The replacement of generic divs with semantic list elements (ul
/li
) and the addition of aria-label="Contacts"
significantly improves accessibility. This structure:
- Makes the content more navigable for screen reader users
- Provides clear context through the aria-label
- Follows HTML semantic best practices
Line range hint 1-63
: Verify consistent semantic structure
Let's ensure these accessibility improvements are consistent across related components.
✅ Verification successful
Semantic structure and accessibility attributes are well-implemented
The verification shows consistent and proper implementation of accessibility features:
- All interactive elements (
<a>
tags) have descriptivearia-label
attributes - Proper heading hierarchy with
<h1>
in Bio component - Contact links list has appropriate
aria-label="Contacts"
- Decorative elements correctly marked with
aria-hidden="true"
- Semantic HTML structure is maintained across components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for semantic HTML usage and accessibility attributes in related files
# Check for semantic list usage in components
echo "Checking for semantic list structures:"
rg -l 'div id="contacts"' src/
rg -l '<ul aria-label=' src/
# Check for proper heading structure
echo "Checking heading hierarchy:"
ast-grep --pattern '<h1>$$$</h1>'
# Check for aria-labels
echo "Checking aria-label usage:"
rg 'aria-label=' src/
Length of output: 593
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for consistent semantic structure in Bio component
echo "Checking Bio component structure:"
cat src/components/Bio/Bio.astro
# Check Homepage component structure
echo -e "\nChecking Homepage component structure:"
cat src/components/Homepage/Homepage.astro
# Check Contact component structure
echo -e "\nChecking Contact component structure:"
cat src/components/Contact/Contact.astro
# Check for any other list structures that might need aria-labels
echo -e "\nChecking other list structures:"
rg '<ul' src/ -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 4553
close #
✏️ Description
Improve a11y reliability.
🔄 Type of the Change