Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spack Components for OM3 #171

Draft
wants to merge 40 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Spack Components for OM3 #171

wants to merge 40 commits into from

Conversation

anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

@anton-seaice anton-seaice commented Nov 27, 2024

This is an extremely draft collection of changes to spack-packages to build OM3 by component.

I've been building access3-share with '+install_libraries' in the spec, I haven't looked at building with an executable yet

I've been using these git versions :

https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/CICE/tree/5-port_cmake_build

and

https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access3-share/tree/share_prototype

Example deployment: ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#35

@anton-seaice anton-seaice marked this pull request as draft November 29, 2024 04:29
@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

Contributes to #163

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is still a draft but is ready for a review for style / approach.

I've only implemented for CICE6 at this point, see the example deployment in ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#35

Comment on lines +16 to +17
url = "https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/archive/refs/tags/CICE6.6.0.tar.gz"
version("6.6.0", md5="1c678c0af67bf09f92c0a861344c3a92")
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anton-seaice anton-seaice Feb 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
url = "https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/archive/refs/tags/CICE6.6.0.tar.gz"
version("6.6.0", md5="1c678c0af67bf09f92c0a861344c3a92")

Shall we pre-emptively create a version("access-om3", branch="main") here ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this interact with the access3 variant?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CMake build will pick the correct "driver" code to work with dependencies built in access3-share

a.k.a the customisation in our fork are not essential for the model to build, but misses some nice to have customisation in our fork

I am not sure thats the question ?

Copy link
Member

@aidanheerdegen aidanheerdegen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hope that is helpful

depends_on("[email protected]:", type="build")
depends_on("mpi")
depends_on("[email protected]:", when="io_type=NetCDF")
depends_on("[email protected]: build_type==RelWithDebInfo", when="io_type=PIO")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is overriding the global build_type variant. Is that intentional?

"build_type",
default="Release",
description="The build type to build",
values=("Debug", "Release"),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No option for RelWithDebInfo?

depends_on("esmf cflags='-fp-model precise' fflags='-fp-model precise'", when="%intel")
depends_on("[email protected]:")

depends_on("[email protected]: build_type==RelWithDebInfo")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

build_type hard-coded.

"build_type",
default="Release",
description="The build type to build",
values=("Debug", "Release"),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No RelWithDebInfo option?

depends_on("[email protected]:", type="build")
depends_on("mpi")
depends_on("[email protected]:")
depends_on("[email protected]: build_type==RelWithDebInfo precision=64 +large_file ~gfs_phys ~quad_precision")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hard codes build_type and there is no build_type variant as there is in other packages.

Comment on lines +58 to +60
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_C_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpicc))
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpicxx))
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpifc))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These should no longer be necessary.

Comment on lines +68 to +70
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_C_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpicc))
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpicxx))
args.append(self.define("CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER", self.spec["mpi"].mpifc))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should no longer be needed I believe.

depends_on("mpi")

for configurations in ["CICE6", "MOM6-CICE6", "MOM6-CICE6-WW3", "CICE6-WW3"]:
depends_on("access-cice+cesmcoupled+access3")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this short-hand for:

depends_on("access-cice")
depends_on("cesmcoupled")
depends_on("access3")

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to have this separate package? Couldn't all this be just be put in the access-mom6 package?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is the extent of my high-level feedback. The rest is pretty low level I'm afraid.

"build_type",
default="Release",
description="The build type to build",
values=("Debug", "Release"),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No option for RelWithDebInfo?

Doesn't the CMakePackage provide this variant automatically anyway?

https://spack.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build_systems/cmakepackage.html#cmake-build-type

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants