Sensitivities for AlgebraicRule models

[dweindl]

Support for AlgebraicRules was added in #2017. Sensitivity analysis is not yet supported.

Looking for volunteers to finish that.

Test case: pytest tests/testSBMLSuite.py::test_sbml_testsuite_case[00039] (and many others in this suite)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2101 (afdc731) into develop (7d161a6) will decrease coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 5.26%.

❗ Current head afdc731 differs from pull request most recent head 74b9d3d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 74b9d3d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2101      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    76.67%   76.45%   -0.22%     
===========================================
  Files           82       81       -1     
  Lines        14939    14864      -75     
===========================================
- Hits         11454    11364      -90     
- Misses        3485     3500      +15     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cpp	73.44% <5.26%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
petab	54.40% <ø> (+0.16%)	⬆️
python	76.82% <ø> (-0.47%)	⬇️
sbmlsuite	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/model_dae.cpp	30.35% <5.26%> (-1.75%)	⬇️

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes