Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Making one line change and adding unit test #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

ActuallyConnor
Copy link
Owner

@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced type safety for the exec method in the Pdo class, now requiring a string parameter.
    • Introduced a new test for the selectSingleRow() method to ensure accurate database querying.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the reliability of database interactions through stricter parameter validation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a modification to the exec method in the Pdo class, where its parameter type has been updated from a loosely typed variable to a strictly typed string. This adjustment enhances type safety for the method. Additionally, a new test method, testSelectSingleRow(), has been introduced in the PdoQueriesTest class to validate the functionality of the selectSingleRow() method in the PdoQueries class.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/Pdo.php Updated exec method parameter type from $statement to string $statement.
tests/Unit/PdoQueriesTest.php Added testSelectSingleRow() method to test selectSingleRow() functionality.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A string was born to lead the way.
With tests to chase the bugs away,
We hop along, brightening the day!
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/Unit/PdoQueriesTest.php (1)

50-71: LGTM with suggestions for improvement!

The new test method is well-structured and follows the established patterns in the test class. Consider these enhancements:

  1. Test edge cases by adding additional test methods for:
    • Empty result set
    • Multiple rows in the database (verify LIMIT 1 works)
  2. Add a descriptive docblock to document the test's purpose and expectations

Here's a suggested docblock to improve documentation:

+    /**
+     * @test
+     * @covers \Pseudo\UnitTest\SampleModels\PdoQueries::selectSingleRow
+     * @description Verifies that selectSingleRow returns the latest user record
+     */
     public function testSelectSingleRow(): void
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de9a70f and 4d99a12.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Pdo.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/Unit/PdoQueriesTest.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/Unit/PdoQueriesTest.php (1)

52-61: Verify test coverage for the exec method type change.

Since this PR includes a change to make the exec method's parameter strictly typed as string, we should verify that this test adequately covers that change.

Let's check how selectSingleRow() interacts with the exec method:

src/Pdo.php (1)

77-77: LGTM! Type safety improvement aligns with PHP's PDO.

The parameter type declaration change from loosely typed to string enhances type safety and correctly matches PHP's native PDO::exec() method signature.

Let's verify the alignment with PHP's native PDO implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Type safety improvement is correct and well-tested

The change to add string type to the exec() method parameter is verified to be correct based on:

  1. The implementation is properly tested in PdoClassTest::testExec()
  2. The class is a mock PDO implementation used for testing, where type safety is beneficial
  3. The change aligns with PHP's native PDO as this is a mock implementation extending the native PDO class
  4. The implementation internally uses query() which expects a string parameter
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the exec method signature matches PHP's native PDO
# Expected: The signature should show string parameter type

# Search for PDO::exec method signature in PHP documentation
rg --type=php "PDO::exec.*string" 

Length of output: 35


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation and usage of exec method in the codebase

# Find the complete implementation of exec method
ast-grep --pattern 'public function exec($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any test files or usages that might provide context
rg "exec.*statement" -A 3

Length of output: 398


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any tests that verify the behavior
# and look for any other usages of the exec method

# Find test files
fd "test.*\.php$"

# Look for any exec method calls in tests
rg "->exec\(" -A 2

# Check if there's a README or documentation about the purpose of this mock PDO
cat README.md

Length of output: 6694


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test file for exec method usage and the actual implementation
rg "->exec\(" --no-filename -B 2 -A 2 tests/

# Check the specific test file for PDO class
cat "tests/Unit/PdoClassTest.php"

# Look for any exec-related tests
rg "test.*exec" -i tests/

Length of output: 6763

@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor merged commit b3cf454 into main Nov 1, 2024
10 checks passed
@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor deleted the feature/coderabbit-integration branch November 1, 2024 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant