Complete, Imperfect Win Logic #12
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…gic seems sound to me :/
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Completed the project, but my win function isn't exactly right. I am not sure what's wrong with it, because my original logic felt really sound, but the number of re-designs left me unsure of what I need to fix. I originally used a board replica matrix of [[row one], [row two], [row three]], and then realized I couldn't directly use the ids ([0][0]) to reference because of the lack of interpolation. Bad planning happened, and a few mistakes were made.
Aside from my win-cases being imperfect, it's alright. No styling improvements visual assets, sorry for the ugly 👎